mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Data > Marin's Mersenne-aries > Completed Missions

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 2003-11-03, 09:25   #12
outlnder
 
outlnder's Avatar
 
Aug 2002

31810 Posts
Default

We've discussed the private notification and the consensus is it is too personal. The email list George has is not to be used in this manner. George also decided that it would be wrong to use the email idea to notify users of old software.

Currently I have produced more bad results than anyone. If someone would have notified me early on, I would have changed my method of buying and setting up machines. A thread naming my boxes as bad or error-prone would have saved me almost 100 CPU hours of waste. Wasted electricity and wasted money in buying inferior motherboards that could not handle the strain of 24/7/365.

Even if the list is for older machines it would be useful to some. I would have killed for such a list if I would have known that the eroor detection on the Prime95 client was not foolproof.
outlnder is offline  
Old 2003-11-03, 15:58   #13
Joe O
 
Joe O's Avatar
 
Aug 2002

3·52·7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by GP2

- The main reason is because it would be of only limited use. It takes a triple-check to definitely determine that a result was erroneous, which means that the erroneous results were often returned years ago, and many of the machines now identified as error-prone are not even in service anymore. By contrast, there are a whole bunch of modern machines currently crunching first-time LL tests that we have little or no information about, because none of their exponents have ever had a double-check.

So, the current list of error-prone machines is mostly useful for identifying which exponents need an early double-check. It's not very useful for determining which modern machines are error-prone (unless those modern machines happen to be set to do double-checking rather than first-time testing).
GP2, Then maybe it is time to change our approach. Could you produce a list of machines that have not had any results double checked? Could you produce lists of exponents, one from each of these machines, that should be double checked as soon as possible? Once these are checked, we would have some idea of the reliability of these machines.
Joe O is offline  
Old 2004-08-12, 00:41   #14
Mersenne-ary
 
Mersenne-ary's Avatar
 
Aug 2004

2·5 Posts
Default

Shouldn't this go to Completed Missions?
Mersenne-ary is offline  
 

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Triple check required houding PrimeNet 14 2015-12-21 09:34
mprime ROUND OFF ERROR: Triple-check advised? Bdot Software 5 2012-12-22 22:34
same exponent reassigned for triple-check S485122 PrimeNet 8 2009-08-16 23:16
An unnecessary triple check ? S485122 PrimeNet 9 2008-09-24 13:41
Team Prime Rib: priority orphanage exponents GP2 Data 22 2004-02-03 22:59

All times are UTC. The time now is 16:41.

Mon Apr 19 16:41:14 UTC 2021 up 11 days, 11:22, 0 users, load averages: 2.86, 2.75, 2.53

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.