mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware > GPU Computing > GpuOwl

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2021-08-24, 04:46   #2729
DrobinsonPE
 
Aug 2020

25×3 Posts
Default Ryzen 5 5600G

Code:
GPUOWL, AMD Ryzen 5 5600G, ASROCK B450-HDV R4.0, DDR4-3600 RAM
----------------------------------------------------------------
C:\Users\User\GPUOWL\v611380>gpuowl-win -log 10000 -iters 200000 -prp 77936867
2021-08-23 20:55:06 gpuowl v6.11-380-g79ea0cc
2021-08-23 20:55:06 Note: not found 'config.txt'
2021-08-23 20:55:06 config: -log 10000 -iters 200000 -prp 77936867
2021-08-23 20:55:06 device 0, unique id ''
2021-08-23 20:55:06 gfx90c-0 77936867 FFT: 4M 1K:8:256 (18.58 bpw)
2021-08-23 20:55:06 gfx90c-0 Expected maximum carry32: 583B0000
2021-08-23 20:55:06 gfx90c-0 OpenCL args "-DEXP=77936867u -DWIDTH=1024u -DSMALL_HEIGHT=256u -DMIDDLE=8u -DPM1=0 -DAMDGPU=1 -DMM_CHAIN=1u -DMM2_CHAIN=2u -DMAX_ACCURACY=1 -DWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=0xa.c42d0d7cec038p-5 -DIWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=-0x8.0e50c8817ddf8p-5  -cl-unsafe-math-optimizations -cl-std=CL2.0 -cl-finite-math-only "
2021-08-23 20:55:06 gfx90c-0 ASM compilation failed, retrying compilation using NO_ASM
2021-08-23 20:55:08 gfx90c-0 OpenCL compilation in 1.72 s
2021-08-23 20:55:12 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   200000 loaded: blockSize 400, f0b04b45b0855bd2
2021-08-23 20:55:12 gfx90c-0 validating proof residues for power 8
2021-08-23 20:55:12 gfx90c-0 Proof using power 8
2021-08-23 20:55:22 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   200800   0.26%; 8494 us/it; ETA 7d 15:25; 895b034c5473a608 (check 3.43s)
2021-08-23 20:56:43 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   210000   0.27%; 8463 us/it; ETA 7d 14:43; 43eb2fc2424d8aac (check 3.42s)
2021-08-23 20:58:11 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   220000   0.28%; 8459 us/it; ETA 7d 14:36; a1081c6dc6a7689f (check 3.42s)
2021-08-23 20:59:39 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   230000   0.30%; 8459 us/it; ETA 7d 14:36; 2387818d3d3d0d01 (check 3.42s)
2021-08-23 21:01:07 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   240000   0.31%; 8458 us/it; ETA 7d 14:33; a9deae45055e5216 (check 3.42s)
2021-08-23 21:02:35 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   250000   0.32%; 8461 us/it; ETA 7d 14:35; 89fcab15218f7cac (check 3.42s)
2021-08-23 21:04:03 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   260000   0.33%; 8459 us/it; ETA 7d 14:31; 55da428da4cf928a (check 3.42s)
2021-08-23 21:05:31 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   270000   0.35%; 8459 us/it; ETA 7d 14:29; dc349756c5f05abf (check 3.42s)
2021-08-23 21:06:59 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   280000   0.36%; 8459 us/it; ETA 7d 14:28; 3564af24488443f4 (check 3.42s)
2021-08-23 21:08:28 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   290000   0.37%; 8459 us/it; ETA 7d 14:27; 63fb281a06f78198 (check 3.42s)
2021-08-23 21:09:56 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   300000   0.38%; 8459 us/it; ETA 7d 14:25; 990aa099aad5bf9c (check 3.42s)
2021-08-23 21:11:24 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   310000   0.40%; 8466 us/it; ETA 7d 14:33; 61e14297a2cc0096 (check 3.42s)
2021-08-23 21:12:52 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   320000   0.41%; 8459 us/it; ETA 7d 14:23; 37e630c5f956cf8a (check 3.42s)
2021-08-23 21:14:20 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   330000   0.42%; 8461 us/it; ETA 7d 14:23; 66ccde7e28ce2b33 (check 3.42s)
2021-08-23 21:15:48 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   340000   0.44%; 8467 us/it; ETA 7d 14:30; d4a7cff61adaa84e (check 3.50s)
2021-08-23 21:17:16 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   350000   0.45%; 8459 us/it; ETA 7d 14:18; d57b659cc1ca2753 (check 3.42s)
2021-08-23 21:18:44 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   360000   0.46%; 8463 us/it; ETA 7d 14:22; 992df79b843f90de (check 3.42s)
2021-08-23 21:20:12 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   370000   0.47%; 8459 us/it; ETA 7d 14:16; 10b0b99eba490a1e (check 3.42s)
2021-08-23 21:21:40 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   380000   0.49%; 8459 us/it; ETA 7d 14:14; 56b1e40cd2666109 (check 3.42s)
2021-08-23 21:23:08 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   390000   0.50%; 8459 us/it; ETA 7d 14:13; ecccd874a8a0d961 (check 3.42s)
2021-08-23 21:24:29 gfx90c-0 Stopping, please wait..
2021-08-23 21:24:36 gfx90c-0 77936867 OK   400000   0.51%; 8459 us/it; ETA 7d 14:12; c03f94396a5aa29e (check 3.42s)
2021-08-23 21:24:36 gfx90c-0 Exiting because "stop requested"
2021-08-23 21:24:36 gfx90c-0 Bye
DrobinsonPE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-09-11, 21:21   #2730
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

127178 Posts
Default a few models benchmarked

RX550 in condorella HP Z600 workstation, dual(xeon E5645 6 core & HT), Windows 7 Pro x64; stock clock & power levels, GPU driver version given by GPU-Z: 25.20.14007.1000(Adrenalin 18.10.2) / Win7 64
Other system loads: prime95 on all 12 actual cpu cores, gpuowl on RX480 GPU, Windows remote desktop
Code:
\gpuowl-compile\gpuowl-v6.11-364-g36f4e2a\rx550>gpuowl-win -prp 77936867
2021-09-11 15:09:00 gpuowl v6.11-364-g36f4e2a
2021-09-11 15:09:00 config: -device 1 -user kriesel -cpu condorella/rx550 -maxAlloc 3600 -proof 9 -use NO_ASM
2021-09-11 15:09:00 config: -prp 77936867
2021-09-11 15:09:00 device 1, unique id ''
2021-09-11 15:09:00 condorella/rx550 77936867 FFT: 4M 1K:8:256 (18.58 bpw)
2021-09-11 15:09:00 condorella/rx550 Expected maximum carry32: 583B0000
2021-09-11 15:09:02 condorella/rx550 OpenCL args "-DEXP=77936867u -DWIDTH=1024u -DSMALL_HEIGHT=256u -DMIDDLE=8u -DPM1=0 -DAMDGPU=1 -DMM_CHAI
N=1u -DMM2_CHAIN=2u -DMAX_ACCURACY=1 -DWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=0xa.c42d0d7cec038p-5 -DIWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=-0x8.0e50c8817ddf8p-5 -DNO_ASM=1  -cl
-unsafe-math-optimizations -cl-std=CL2.0 -cl-finite-math-only "
2021-09-11 15:09:07 condorella/rx550 OpenCL compilation in 4.96 s
2021-09-11 15:09:12 condorella/rx550 77936867 OK        0 loaded: blockSize 400, 0000000000000003
2021-09-11 15:09:12 condorella/rx550 validating proof residues for power 9
2021-09-11 15:09:12 condorella/rx550 Proof using power 9
2021-09-11 15:09:27 condorella/rx550 77936867 OK      800   0.00%; 12181 us/it; ETA 10d 23:42; 1579c241dc63eca6 (check 5.00s)
2021-09-11 15:50:16 condorella/rx550 77936867 OK   200000   0.26%; 12267 us/it; ETA 11d 00:54; f0b04b45b0855bd2 (check 5.32s)
GTX1650 in Lenovo D20 workstation dual(xeon e5-2670 6 core & HT), Windows 7 Pro x64; stock clocks; gpu temp 63C, GPU driver version given by GPU-Z: 26.21.14.4219 (NVIDIA 442.19) / Win7 64
Other system loads: prime95 on all 12 actual cpu cores, Windows remote desktop, 8 mfactor threads using the HT
Code:
\gpuowl-v6.11-380-g79ea0c>gpuowl-win -prp 77936867
2021-09-11 15:41:38 gpuowl v6.11-380-g79ea0cc
2021-09-11 15:41:38 config: -user Kriesel -d 0 -cpu emu_gtx1650
2021-09-11 15:41:38 config: -prp 77936867
2021-09-11 15:41:38 device 0, unique id ''
2021-09-11 15:41:38 emu_gtx1650 77936867 FFT: 4M 1K:8:256 (18.58 bpw)
2021-09-11 15:41:38 emu_gtx1650 Expected maximum carry32: 583B0000
2021-09-11 15:41:40 emu_gtx1650 OpenCL args "-DEXP=77936867u -DWIDTH=1024u -DSMALL_HEIGHT=256u -DMIDDLE=8u -DPM1=0 -DMM_CHAIN=1u -DMM2_CHAIN=2u -DMAX_ACCURACY=1 -
DWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=0xa.c42d0d7cec038p-5 -DIWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=-0x8.0e50c8817ddf8p-5  -cl-unsafe-math-optimizations -cl-std=CL2.0 -cl-finite-math-only "
2021-09-11 15:41:46 emu_gtx1650

2021-09-11 15:41:46 emu_gtx1650 OpenCL compilation in 6.37 s
2021-09-11 15:41:50 emu_gtx1650 77936867 OK        0 loaded: blockSize 400, 0000000000000003
2021-09-11 15:41:50 emu_gtx1650 validating proof residues for power 8
2021-09-11 15:41:50 emu_gtx1650 Proof using power 8
2021-09-11 15:42:02 emu_gtx1650 77936867 OK      800   0.00%; 9270 us/it; ETA 8d 08:42; 1579c241dc63eca6 (check 3.88s)
2021-09-11 16:13:06 emu_gtx1650 77936867 OK   200000   0.26%; 9340 us/it; ETA 8d 09:42; f0b04b45b0855bd2 (check 3.93s)
GTX1050Ti in condorette HP Z600 workstation dual(xeon x5650 6 core & HT); Windows 7 Home x64; stock clocks; GPU power level 62W cap, GPU when switched from TF 78C; 71C after Gpuowl a while; GPU driver version given by GPU-Z: 21.21.13.7866(NVIDIA 378.66)/Win7 64
Other system loads: CUDAPm1 on Quadro 2000, Windows remote desktop, prime95 on all 12 actual cpu cores
Code:
\gpuowl-v6.11-380-g79ea0cc>gpuowl-win -prp 77936867
2021-09-11 15:12:36 gpuowl v6.11-380-g79ea0cc
2021-09-11 15:12:36 config: -user kriesel -cpu condorette/gtx1050ti -d 0 -maxAlloc 3500 -yield
2021-09-11 15:12:36 config:
2021-09-11 15:12:36 config: -prp 77936867
2021-09-11 15:12:36 device 0, unique id ''
2021-09-11 15:12:36 condorette/gtx1050ti 77936867 FFT: 4M 1K:8:256 (18.58 bpw)
2021-09-11 15:12:36 condorette/gtx1050ti Expected maximum carry32: 583B0000
2021-09-11 15:12:37 condorette/gtx1050ti OpenCL args "-DEXP=77936867u -DWIDTH=1024u -DSMALL_HEIGHT=256u -DMIDDLE=8u -DPM1=0 -DMM_CH
AIN=1u -DMM2_CHAIN=2u -DMAX_ACCURACY=1 -DWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=0xa.c42d0d7cec038p-5 -DIWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=-0x8.0e50c8817ddf8p-5  -cl
-unsafe-math-optimizations -cl-std=CL2.0 -cl-finite-math-only "
2021-09-11 15:12:42 condorette/gtx1050ti

2021-09-11 15:12:42 condorette/gtx1050ti OpenCL compilation in 4.89 s
2021-09-11 15:12:48 condorette/gtx1050ti 77936867 OK        0 loaded: blockSize 400, 0000000000000003
2021-09-11 15:12:48 condorette/gtx1050ti validating proof residues for power 8
2021-09-11 15:12:48 condorette/gtx1050ti Proof using power 8
2021-09-11 15:13:01 condorette/gtx1050ti 77936867 OK      800   0.00%; 11334 us/it; ETA 10d 05:22; 1579c241dc63eca6 (check 4.65s)
2021-09-11 15:51:10 condorette/gtx1050ti 77936867 OK   200000   0.26%; 11463 us/it; ETA 10d 07:31; f0b04b45b0855bd2 (check 4.69s)
GTX 1050Ti in peregrine Dell G3 3579 laptop i7-8750H 6 core & HT; Windows 7 Home x64; stock clock & power levels; GPU temp 91C & stable during gpuowl benchmark; GPU driver version as given by GPU-Z: 27.21.14.6231(Nvidia 462.31) DCH/ Win10 64
Other system loads: TightVNC remote access, mlucas V20.1 PRP DC on 4 threads, prime95 v30.6b4 on 4 cores
Code:
\gpuowl-v6.11-380-g79ea0cc>gpuowl-win -prp 77936867
2021-09-11 15:19:32 gpuowl v6.11-380-g79ea0cc
2021-09-11 15:19:32 config: -cpu peregine/gtx1050Ti -user kriesel -device 0 -log 10000 -safeMath -proof 8 -maxAlloc 3200 -use NO_ASM -yield
2021-09-11 15:19:32 config: -prp 77936867
2021-09-11 15:19:32 device 0, unique id ''
2021-09-11 15:19:32 peregine/gtx1050Ti 77936867 FFT: 4M 1K:8:256 (18.58 bpw)
2021-09-11 15:19:32 peregine/gtx1050Ti Expected maximum carry32: 583B0000
2021-09-11 15:19:38 peregine/gtx1050Ti OpenCL args "-DEXP=77936867u -DWIDTH=1024u -DSMALL_HEIGHT=256u -DMIDDLE=8u -DPM1=0 -DMM_CHAIN=1u -DMM2_CHAIN=2u -DMAX_ACCURACY=1 -DWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=0xa.c42d0d7cec038p-5 -DIWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=-0x8.0e50c8817ddf8p-5 -DNO_ASM=1  -cl-std=CL2.0 -cl-finite-math-only "
2021-09-11 15:19:46 peregine/gtx1050Ti

2021-09-11 15:19:46 peregine/gtx1050Ti OpenCL compilation in 8.42 s
2021-09-11 15:19:52 peregine/gtx1050Ti 77936867 OK        0 loaded: blockSize 400, 0000000000000003
2021-09-11 15:19:52 peregine/gtx1050Ti validating proof residues for power 8
2021-09-11 15:19:52 peregine/gtx1050Ti Proof using power 8
2021-09-11 15:20:07 peregine/gtx1050Ti 77936867 OK      800   0.00%; 12234 us/it; ETA 11d 00:51; 1579c241dc63eca6 (check 5.17s)
2021-09-11 15:22:06 peregine/gtx1050Ti 77936867 OK    10000   0.01%; 12372 us/it; ETA 11d 03:48; fc4f135f7cf4ad29 (check 5.44s)
2021-09-11 15:24:23 peregine/gtx1050Ti 77936867 OK    20000   0.03%; 13062 us/it; ETA 11d 18:42; 3cd1bd9d5e09cbc5 (check 5.64s)
2021-09-11 15:26:42 peregine/gtx1050Ti 77936867 OK    30000   0.04%; 13387 us/it; ETA 12d 01:43; c4e0ff35e3290d98 (check 5.69s)
2021-09-11 15:29:03 peregine/gtx1050Ti 77936867 OK    40000   0.05%; 13542 us/it; ETA 12d 05:02; dffe1b1b0d748128 (check 5.63s)
2021-09-11 15:31:25 peregine/gtx1050Ti 77936867 OK    50000   0.06%; 13567 us/it; ETA 12d 05:31; 52e286945371ed29 (check 5.80s)
2021-09-11 15:33:47 peregine/gtx1050Ti 77936867 OK    60000   0.08%; 13622 us/it; ETA 12d 06:41; 0945da4dc08bdd95 (check 5.85s)
2021-09-11 15:36:09 peregine/gtx1050Ti 77936867 OK    70000   0.09%; 13615 us/it; ETA 12d 06:29; 7131fa4eb77f4bb2 (check 5.79s)
2021-09-11 15:38:32 peregine/gtx1050Ti 77936867 OK    80000   0.10%; 13771 us/it; ETA 12d 09:50; 8d76071d27ee4221 (check 5.69s)
2021-09-11 15:40:55 peregine/gtx1050Ti 77936867 OK    90000   0.12%; 13718 us/it; ETA 12d 08:38; 0bacff453b2f470e (check 5.78s)
2021-09-11 15:43:19 peregine/gtx1050Ti 77936867 OK   100000   0.13%; 13767 us/it; ETA 12d 09:40; 6d7296b9e2830f50 (check 5.80s)
2021-09-11 15:45:42 peregine/gtx1050Ti 77936867 OK   110000   0.14%; 13758 us/it; ETA 12d 09:25; 8cbfd4435622bda7 (check 5.83s)
2021-09-11 15:48:06 peregine/gtx1050Ti 77936867 OK   120000   0.15%; 13776 us/it; ETA 12d 09:47; 79ae5dad855057ad (check 5.81s)
2021-09-11 15:50:29 peregine/gtx1050Ti 77936867 OK   130000   0.17%; 13768 us/it; ETA 12d 09:34; 50c97bcbf876231f (check 5.86s)
2021-09-11 15:52:53 peregine/gtx1050Ti 77936867 OK   140000   0.18%; 13773 us/it; ETA 12d 09:38; e1db15f897271496 (check 5.85s)
2021-09-11 15:55:16 peregine/gtx1050Ti 77936867 OK   150000   0.19%; 13758 us/it; ETA 12d 09:17; 127631386c6a9b17 (check 5.82s)
2021-09-11 15:57:40 peregine/gtx1050Ti 77936867 OK   160000   0.21%; 13799 us/it; ETA 12d 10:07; 25b7b6206fc6f085 (check 5.73s)
2021-09-11 16:00:04 peregine/gtx1050Ti 77936867 OK   170000   0.22%; 13772 us/it; ETA 12d 09:30; 416816b0d9f4bba8 (check 5.84s)
2021-09-11 16:02:28 peregine/gtx1050Ti 77936867 OK   180000   0.23%; 13841 us/it; ETA 12d 10:57; 6bee5d054f770861 (check 5.79s)
kriesel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-09-14, 13:39   #2731
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

3×1,861 Posts
Default Iris Xe IGP

Ancient V1.9 can be run on it (although not with -fft DP, and it produces less throughput, than its negative impact on prime95 on the CPU)
Code:
\gpuowl-v1.9-74f1a38>gpuowl -device 0 -user kriesel -cpu martinella-IrisXeIGP -fft M61
gpuOwL v1.9- GPU Mersenne primality checker
Intel(R) Iris(R) Xe Graphics, 96x1300MHz

OpenCL compilation in 45840 ms, with "-I. -cl-fast-relaxed-math -cl-std=CL2.0  -DEXP=77936867u -DWIDTH=1024u -DHEIGHT=2048u -DLOG_NWORDS=22u -DFGT_61=1 -DLOG_ROOT2=49u "
Note: using long carry kernels
PRP-3: FFT 4M (1024 * 2048 * 2) of 77936867 (18.58 bits/word) [2021-09-13 12:35:42 Central Daylight Time]
Starting at iteration 0
OK        0 / 77936867 [ 0.00%], 0.00 ms/it; ETA 0d 00:00; 0000000000000003 [12:36:04]
OK     1000 / 77936867 [ 0.00%], 40.50 ms/it; ETA 36d 12:52; 9711fce020e74461 [12:37:07]
OK     5000 / 77936867 [ 0.01%], 40.58 ms/it; ETA 36d 14:22; 31d8d3401e6fe48d [12:40:11]
OK    10000 / 77936867 [ 0.01%], 39.37 ms/it; ETA 35d 12:13; fc4f135f7cf4ad29 [12:43:49]
OK    20000 / 77936867 [ 0.03%], 38.88 ms/it; ETA 35d 01:36; 3cd1bd9d5e09cbc5 [12:50:40]
OK    40000 / 77936867 [ 0.05%], 38.25 ms/it; ETA 34d 11:34; dffe1b1b0d748128 [13:03:46]
OK    60000 / 77936867 [ 0.08%], 38.51 ms/it; ETA 34d 17:01; 0945da4dc08bdd95 [13:16:56]
OK    80000 / 77936867 [ 0.10%], 38.29 ms/it; ETA 34d 12:08; 8d76071d27ee4221 [13:30:02]
OK   100000 / 77936867 [ 0.13%], 38.53 ms/it; ETA 34d 17:09; 6d7296b9e2830f50 [13:43:14]
OK   150000 / 77936867 [ 0.19%], 38.22 ms/it; ETA 34d 09:49; 127631386c6a9b17 [14:15:26]
OK   200000 / 77936867 [ 0.26%], 38.21 ms/it; ETA 34d 09:05; f0b04b45b0855bd2 [14:47:38]
OK   250000 / 77936867 [ 0.32%], 38.30 ms/it; ETA 34d 10:31; 89fcab15218f7cac [15:19:55]
OK   300000 / 77936867 [ 0.38%], 38.36 ms/it; ETA 34d 11:13; 990aa099aad5bf9c [15:52:14]
V6.11-380 fails to run:
Code:
\gpuowl-v6.11-380-g79ea0cc>gpuowl-win
2021-09-14 08:34:00 gpuowl v6.11-380-g79ea0cc
2021-09-14 08:34:00 config: -cpu martinella-IrisXeIGP -user kriesel -use NO_ASM -device 0 -proof 9
2021-09-14 08:34:00 device 0, unique id ''
2021-09-14 08:34:00 martinella-IrisXeIGP 77936867 FFT: 4M 1K:8:256 (18.58 bpw)
2021-09-14 08:34:00 martinella-IrisXeIGP Expected maximum carry32: 583B0000
2021-09-14 08:34:01 martinella-IrisXeIGP OpenCL args "-DEXP=77936867u -DWIDTH=1024u -DSMALL_HEIGHT=256u -DMIDDLE=8u -DPM1=0 -DMM_CHAIN=1u -DMM2_CHAIN=2u -DMAX_ACCURACY=1 -DWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=0xa.c42d0d7cec038p-5 -DIWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=-0x8.0e50c8817ddf8p-5 -DNO_ASM=1  -cl-unsafe-math-optimizations -cl-std=CL2.0 -cl-finite-math-only "
2021-09-14 08:34:03 martinella-IrisXeIGP ASM compilation failed, retrying compilation using NO_ASM
2021-09-14 08:34:04 martinella-IrisXeIGP OpenCL compilation error -11 (args -DEXP=77936867u -DWIDTH=1024u -DSMALL_HEIGHT=256u -DMIDDLE=8u -DPM1=0 -DMM_CHAIN=1u -DMM2_CHAIN=2u -DMAX_ACCURACY=1 -DWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=0xa.c42d0d7cec038p-5 -DIWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=-0x8.0e50c8817ddf8p-5 -DNO_ASM=1  -cl-unsafe-math-optimizations -cl-std=CL2.0 -cl-finite-math-only  -DNO_ASM=1)
2021-09-14 08:34:04 martinella-IrisXeIGP 1:190:9: error: use of type 'double' requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
typedef double T;
        ^
1:191:9: error: unknown type name 'double2'; did you mean 'double'?
typedef double2 T2;
        ^~~~~~~
        double
1:191:9: error: use of type 'double' requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
1:201:7: error: use of type 'T' (aka 'double') requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
T2 U2(T a, T b) { return (T2)(a, b); }
      ^
1:201:12: error: use of type 'T' (aka 'double') requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
T2 U2(T a, T b) { return (T2)(a, b); }
           ^
1:201:1: error: use of type 'T2' (aka 'double') requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
T2 U2(T a, T b) { return (T2)(a, b); }
^
1:201:27: error: use of type 'T2' (aka 'double') requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
T2 U2(T a, T b) { return (T2)(a, b); }
                          ^
1:207:11: error: use of type 'T' (aka 'double') requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
T add1_m2(T x, T y) {
          ^
1:207:16: error: use of type 'T' (aka 'double') requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
T add1_m2(T x, T y) {
               ^
1:207:1: error: use of type 'T' (aka 'double') requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
T add1_m2(T x, T y) {
^
1:216:11: error: use of type 'T' (aka 'double') requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
T sub1_m2(T x, T y) {
          ^
1:216:16: error: use of type 'T' (aka 'double') requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
T sub1_m2(T x, T y) {
               ^
1:216:1: error: use of type 'T' (aka 'double') requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
T sub1_m2(T x, T y) {
^
1:226:11: error: use of type 'T' (aka 'double') requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
T mul1_m2(T x, T y) {
          ^
1:226:16: error: use of type 'T' (aka 'double') requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
T mul1_m2(T x, T y) {
               ^
1:226:1: error: use of type 'T' (aka 'double') requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
T mul1_m2(T x, T y) {
^
2021-09-14 08:34:04 martinella-IrisXeIGP Exception gpu_error: BUILD_PROGRAM_FAILURE clBuildProgram at clwrap.cpp:246 build
2021-09-14 08:34:04 martinella-IrisXeIGP Bye
kriesel is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mfakto: an OpenCL program for Mersenne prefactoring Bdot GPU Computing 1680 2021-09-13 17:01
GPUOWL AMD Windows OpenCL issues xx005fs GpuOwl 0 2019-07-26 21:37
Testing an expression for primality 1260 Software 17 2015-08-28 01:35
Testing Mersenne cofactors for primality? CRGreathouse Computer Science & Computational Number Theory 18 2013-06-08 19:12
Primality-testing program with multiple types of moduli (PFGW-related) Unregistered Information & Answers 4 2006-10-04 22:38

All times are UTC. The time now is 22:45.


Thu Sep 16 22:45:04 UTC 2021 up 55 days, 17:14, 0 users, load averages: 2.93, 2.86, 2.68

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.