mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Aliquot Sequences

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2020-08-17, 13:47   #430
garambois
 
garambois's Avatar
 
Oct 2011

22×3×29 Posts
Default

@Happy5244 :
Don't I get it ?
I thought it was you !
Would you rather I replaced "HPP" with "A" for Anonymous ?
Because I didn't do the sequence calculations !
Unless the person who did them comes forward...
I hope I didn't make a mistake in the mention of the contributor for base 21.
It's not voluntary if yes !


@RichD :
OK, I'm releasing the orange cells.
But the green ones will always keep our name, because they were finished by you...


@yoyo :
OK.
garambois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-17, 15:03   #431
Happy5214
 
Happy5214's Avatar
 
"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City

32×43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garambois View Post
@Happy5244 :
Don't I get it ?
I thought it was you !
Would you rather I replaced "HPP" with "A" for Anonymous ?
Because I didn't do the sequence calculations !
Unless the person who did them comes forward...
I hope I didn't make a mistake in the mention of the contributor for base 21.
It's not voluntary if yes !
My guess is that they were finished by FactorDB automatically when the sequences were pulled by your script. I think they should be marked Anonymous.
Happy5214 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-17, 15:43   #432
garambois
 
garambois's Avatar
 
Oct 2011

22·3·29 Posts
Default

OK, I'll note them "A".
garambois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-17, 18:37   #433
yoyo
 
yoyo's Avatar
 
Oct 2006
Berlin, Germany

22×3×72 Posts
Default

Do you update the page by script or is it manually work?
yoyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-17, 19:06   #434
garambois
 
garambois's Avatar
 
Oct 2011

22·3·29 Posts
Default

I update the page by script.
But it still takes me more than an hour, because I have to check everything (because of bad handling sometimes), enter the reservations, I have to deal with the different bases separately, reread all the posts to take it into account ...
And I'm missing a lot of time, like everybody else ;-)
garambois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-17, 23:48   #435
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

31·101 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy5214 View Post
I do not deserve any credit for any of the green n=21 sequences, as I did no work on those. I don't know if you (Jean-Luc) did them or if they were done directly on FactorDB, but those shouldn't be attributed to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by garambois View Post
@RichD :
But the green ones will always keep our name, because they were finished by you...
Quote:
Originally Posted by garambois View Post
OK, I'll note them "A".
I am seeing the same thing with base n=30. There was only a handful of exponents I had to advance to get the termination. Let's say any sequence with <= 25 terms (indexes) was created by FDB and should be credited to "A".
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-18, 09:01   #436
garambois
 
garambois's Avatar
 
Oct 2011

22×3×29 Posts
Default

OK, page updated.
Many thanks to all !

Base 14 complete.
Base 510510 complete.
I take base 30.

@Happy5214 :
At the next update, what name of contributor do you want me to put for the green cells of bases 24 and 210 ?

@yoyo :
Now we've got a white cell for Base 3 again !

Last fiddled with by garambois on 2020-08-18 at 09:03
garambois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-18, 10:08   #437
yoyo
 
yoyo's Avatar
 
Oct 2006
Berlin, Germany

22×3×72 Posts
Default

Why is there no table for base 4, 8 and 9?
yoyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-18, 11:05   #438
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

60738 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garambois View Post
I take base 30.
I was still working on the white cells in base 30 but you can have it.
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-18, 11:28   #439
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

31·101 Posts
Default

I'll start table 770.
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-18, 11:29   #440
garambois
 
garambois's Avatar
 
Oct 2011

22×3×29 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yoyo View Post
Why is there no table for base 4, 8 and 9?

The sequences of bases 4 and 8 are the same as those of base 2. Indeed, 4^k=(2^2)^k=2^(2*k) and 8^k=(2^3)^k=2^(3*k) Same for base 9=3^2 with base 3.
garambois is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Broken aliquot sequences fivemack FactorDB 45 2020-05-16 15:22
Broken aliquot sequences schickel FactorDB 18 2013-06-12 16:09
A new theorem about aliquot sequences garambois Aliquot Sequences 34 2012-06-10 21:53
poaching aliquot sequences... Andi47 FactorDB 21 2011-12-29 21:11
New article on aliquot sequences schickel mersennewiki 0 2008-12-30 07:07

All times are UTC. The time now is 03:11.

Sun Oct 25 03:11:05 UTC 2020 up 45 days, 22 mins, 0 users, load averages: 2.20, 2.20, 2.04

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.