mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Blogorrhea > Dobri

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2021-09-22, 00:29   #45
Dobri
 
May 2018

BD16 Posts
Default

Please share if knowing about a reference to a previous study investigating computationally the exact local maxima and minima of the Δπ differences of prime number races.
I am aware about a few papers and several OEIS sequences concerned with Δπ = -1, 0, and 1 differences only.

Last fiddled with by Dobri on 2021-09-22 at 00:58
Dobri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-09-22, 06:07   #46
Dobri
 
May 2018

2758 Posts
Default

Lemma 1: The prime-count distance π(x2) - π(x1) between two primes x1 and x2, x1 < x2, for which Δπ(x1) = Δπ(x2) = 0 (two consecutive zeros without other zeros in between) in a binary prime number race of two prime types is an even number, π(x2) - π(x1) = 2k.
Proof: The number of prime-count steps in one direction must be equal to the number of prime-count steps in the opposite direction of the binary prime number race so that starting from Δπ(x1) = 0 the staircase approximation of distinct prime-count steps has to end up in Δπ(x2) = 0 for which an even number of steps is required.

Lemma 2: The absolute value of an extremum Δπ(xm), x1 < xm < x2, between two primes x1 and x2, x1 < x2, for which Δπ(x1) = Δπ(x2) = 0 (two consecutive zeros without other zeros in between) in a binary prime number race is less than or equal to (π(x2) - π(x1))/2.
Proof: The absolute value of the prime count of the extremum cannot exceed k in Lemma 1.
In the ideal case with only one extremum, the absolute value of said extremum (minimum or maximum) = k.

Therefore, the knowledge of the distribution of consecutive zeros Δπ(x) = 0 can be used to estimate in first approximation the Max[Δπ(x)] distribution and plot an ideal bar graph (assuming a single extremum between consecutive zero Δπ(x) points).

The Littlewood theorem states that Δπ(x) can take arbitrarily large values toward infinity but does not explicitly specify how frequently this could happen in comparison with other Δπ(x) values. Therefore, analyzing the prime number race results from the past, and also performing recounts to obtain the exact local minima and maxima distributions, does matter.

An ideal bar graph (assuming a single extremum between two consecutive zero points) on the basis of the 85,508 zero Δπ(x) points in A096629 can be plotted to show in first approximation the shape of the distribution of the extrema of Δπ(x).
Dobri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-09-22, 09:21   #47
Dobri
 
May 2018

33·7 Posts
Default

Whoever modified the title of this thread, how do you know that the guess is incorrect?
Dobri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-09-22, 09:51   #48
Dobri
 
May 2018

33·7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
P.S. Your "blogging" belongs in Blogorrhea section (where the blogger is the only one reading). Blog as much as you want.

You abuse your power systematically. Attempting to intimidate and belittle ordinary users, you just reveal your true self.
Dobri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-09-22, 11:41   #49
Dr Sardonicus
 
Dr Sardonicus's Avatar
 
Feb 2017
Nowhere

3·5·331 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dobri View Post
The number of primes of type 6k-1 is greater than the number of primes of type 6k+1.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dobri View Post
Whoever modified the title of this thread, how do you know that the guess is incorrect?
2. 5 points for every statement that is clearly vacuous, logically inconsistent, or widely agreed on to be false.
3. 10 points for each such statement that is adhered to despite careful correction.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dobri View Post
The Littlewood theorem states that Δπ(x) can take arbitrarily large values toward infinity but does not explicitly specify how frequently this could happen in comparison with other Δπ(x) values. Therefore, analyzing the prime number race results from the past, and also performing recounts to obtain the exact local minima and maxima distributions, does matter.
7. 10 points for stating that your ideas are of great financial, theoretical and/or spiritual value.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dobri View Post
You abuse your power systematically. Attempting to intimidate and belittle ordinary users, you just reveal your true self.
26. 20 points for each complaint that the list moderators are out to get you or are blocking your substantial and useful posts.

That's 45 points on The PrimePages' Crackpot index right there.
Dr Sardonicus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-09-22, 15:09   #50
Dobri
 
May 2018

18910 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Sardonicus View Post
2. 5 points for every statement that is clearly vacuous, logically inconsistent, or widely agreed on to be false.
3. 10 points for each such statement that is adhered to despite careful correction.

7. 10 points for stating that your ideas are of great financial, theoretical and/or spiritual value.
26. 20 points for each complaint that the list moderators are out to get you or are blocking your substantial and useful posts.
That's 45 points on The PrimePages' Crackpot index right there.
Do you imply that the the initial guess is false, and you arrived at this conclusion after a careful consideration?

Then you must be able to provide tangible evidence, preferably works published by others, to support your careful consideration, and explain yourself clearly without speaking in riddles or giving 'homework'.

Please do not put words in my mouth as it was never stated in this thread that the "ideas are of great financial, theoretical and/or spiritual value."

If you are wrong about points #2, #3, and #7, then adding point #26 does not make sense.
Dobri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-09-22, 15:35   #51
Dr Sardonicus
 
Dr Sardonicus's Avatar
 
Feb 2017
Nowhere

3×5×331 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dobri View Post
Do you imply that the the initial guess is false, and you arrived at this conclusion after a careful consideration?
<snip>
Objection! Already asked and answered!

You have already publicly acknowledged references proving your guess is wrong that were offered, e.g. in this post and this post to this thread.

Objection sustained. I find you guilty of trolling, and will see about imposing a 1-month timeout.
Dr Sardonicus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Number of primes 2^n-1 within certain range of n bur Homework Help 8 2021-02-18 20:54
Number of relative primes for P-1 petrw1 Factoring 4 2018-11-07 20:20
The expected number of primes Batalov Computer Science & Computational Number Theory 5 2016-08-11 01:17
Estimating the number of primes in a partially-factored number CRGreathouse Probability & Probabilistic Number Theory 15 2014-08-13 18:46
Guess a Number davar55 Puzzles 11 2008-03-19 21:33

All times are UTC. The time now is 05:21.


Sat Oct 16 05:21:52 UTC 2021 up 84 days, 23:50, 0 users, load averages: 1.53, 1.18, 1.12

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.