![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
19·347 Posts |
![]()
I should kick myself for releasing code with this bug.
![]() In the 2.5.7 and 2.5.6 releases there is a bug in Work.cpp that will cause the client to rarely (if ever) find a factor. If you running with the new client, you will have to fix this problem immediately. Until I release 2.5.8, this is what you have to do. In Work.cpp in the procedure SetUpCall, look for the line: sprintf(s_Command, "%s -sigma 2937239194 %s < %s > %s", s_GMPExe, temp1, s_InWorkFileName, s_OutWorkFileName); change it to sprintf(s_Command, "%s %s < %s > %s", s_GMPExe, temp1, s_InWorkFileName, s_OutWorkFileName); I am seriously embarassed by this bug and am very sorry for the ECM work that will be lost as a result. I myself lost over 1 year of ECM factoring because of this. I will let you know when 2.5.8 is released. --Mark Rodenkirch Last fiddled with by rogue on 2005-03-14 at 22:45 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Jul 2003
So Cal
44778 Posts |
![]()
Version 2.5.6 is ok. I've been running it for quite a while now on the XYYXF composites, and have found quite a number of factors. In fact, it's running right now with the following work_a.out:
GMP-ECM 6.0 [powered by GMP 4.1.4] [ECM] Input number is 32...19 (219 digits) Using B1=1000000, B2=839549779, polynomial Dickson(3), sigma=3798466865 so sigma isn't at 2937239194 in that version. Greg |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
19×347 Posts |
![]()
Thanks. It's nice to know that only that release has the problem. That limits the scope significantly.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Jul 2003
So Cal
32·263 Posts |
![]()
It looks like I may have spoken too soon! Were there two different 2.5.6 releases? The one I compiled right after the initial release does not have the bug, but the one I downloaded on Feb 17 and compiled on my Linux machine does have the bug! Both claim to be 2.5.6. Hmmm...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
19×347 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Jun 2003
22·61 Posts |
![]()
ive got a quick question about how the behavior of the ecmnet server (2.5.8). When a person is assigned a number are they the only ones who can be working on it or is it possible for multiple people to be assigned the same number to work on at the same time?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
19·347 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ECMNet Client/Server 2.7.2 is Released | rogue | Factoring | 0 | 2006-06-03 15:13 |
ECMNet Client/Server 2.7.1 is Released | rogue | GMP-ECM | 3 | 2006-05-26 13:19 |
ECMNet Client/Server 2.5.7 is Released | rogue | Factoring | 8 | 2006-03-26 13:31 |
ECMNet Client/Server 2.7.0 is Released | rogue | GMP-ECM | 24 | 2006-01-03 19:07 |
ECMNet Client/Server 2.5.6 is Released | rogue | Factoring | 9 | 2005-01-11 03:12 |