20191210, 01:44  #34 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
2^{2}×311 Posts 
Moved my one core of an i3 to 83 digits since the 81's are cleared out.

20191210, 04:03  #35 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
2×3×619 Posts 

20191210, 14:17  #36 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
7202_{8} Posts 

20191212, 20:27  #37 
"Daniel Jackson"
May 2011
14285714285714285714
2×5^{2}×13 Posts 
It seems the DB is down for maintenance atm. I'm guessing that Syd's adding more disk space (i.e. adding HDDs), or possibly fixing the broken Aliquot sequences.
Last fiddled with by Stargate38 on 20191212 at 20:29 
20191214, 16:11  #38  
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
2×3×619 Posts 
Quote:
I noticed a little less than 200 in the 7982 area this morning, so I set all four cores of an i5 and a Colab session to work there and now there are over 200! 

20191215, 01:02  #39  
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
2^{2}×311 Posts 
Quote:


20191215, 16:58  #40 
Sep 2009
2·1,021 Posts 
I'm working on 83 digits in the gaps between clearing 7079 digits. But that's taking most of my time now so I'm only doing about 20/hour. Mostly after skipping 400005000 composites to keep clear of your work.
And just look how many have built up under 70 digits. Factordb will take a while to clear that lot. Chris 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
A suggestion for factordb.  enzocreti  FactorDB  10  20210105 19:49 
Spammers in FactorDB  wpolly  FactorDB  5  20190416 11:19 
Extending Factordb  carpetpool  FactorDB  6  20170123 11:04 
FactorDB PRP's  smh  FactorDB  231  20150728 02:30 
FactorDB question  Raman  Factoring  15  20100128 10:24 