mersenneforum.org Prime95 v30.4/30.5/30.6
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2021-03-13, 02:08   #111
Chuck

May 2011
Orange Park, FL

2×443 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Prime95 Build 30.5 build 1 is available. It fixes the PRP problem described here: https://www.mersenneforum.org/showth...197#post573197
There is no prime95.exe in the windows folders.

 2021-03-13, 02:40 #112 Prime95 P90 years forever!     Aug 2002 Yeehaw, FL 3·11·227 Posts Oops. Fixed.
 2021-03-13, 12:50 #113 ET_ Banned     "Luigi" Aug 2002 Team Italia 2·29·83 Posts OK. Restarted with 30.5.1 a session initiated with 30.4.9, and had the following message: Code: Worker #1 Mar 13 13:46] Worker starting [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:46] Setting affinity to run worker on CPU core #1 [Worker #2 Mar 13 13:46] Waiting 5 seconds to stagger worker starts. [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:46] Setting affinity to run helper thread 1 on CPU core #1 [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:46] Setting affinity to run helper thread 4 on CPU core #3 [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:46] Setting affinity to run helper thread 5 on CPU core #3 [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:46] Setting affinity to run helper thread 6 on CPU core #4 [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:46] Resuming trial factoring of M216166681 to 2^74 [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:46] Setting affinity to run helper thread 3 on CPU core #2 [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:46] Trial factoring M216166681 to 2^74 is 24.56% complete. [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:46] Setting affinity to run helper thread 2 on CPU core #2 [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:46] Setting affinity to run helper thread 7 on CPU core #4 [Worker #2 Mar 13 13:46] Worker starting [Worker #2 Mar 13 13:46] Setting affinity to run worker on CPU core #5 [Worker #2 Mar 13 13:46] Setting affinity to run helper thread 1 on CPU core #6 [Worker #2 Mar 13 13:46] Setting affinity to run helper thread 3 on CPU core #8 while with version 30.4.9 I had the following allorment for the CPUs: Code: [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:47] Worker starting [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:47] Setting affinity to run worker on CPU core #1 [Worker #2 Mar 13 13:47] Waiting 5 seconds to stagger worker starts. [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:47] Setting affinity to run helper thread 1 on CPU core #1 [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:47] Setting affinity to run helper thread 5 on CPU core #3 [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:47] Setting affinity to run helper thread 6 on CPU core #4 [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:47] Setting affinity to run helper thread 3 on CPU core #2 [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:47] Setting affinity to run helper thread 4 on CPU core #3 [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:47] Setting affinity to run helper thread 7 on CPU core #4 [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:47] Resuming trial factoring of M216166681 to 2^74 [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:47] Setting affinity to run helper thread 2 on CPU core #2 [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:47] Trial factoring M216166681 to 2^74 is 24.56% complete. [Worker #2 Mar 13 13:47] Worker starting [Worker #2 Mar 13 13:47] Setting affinity to run worker on CPU core #5 [Worker #2 Mar 13 13:47] Setting affinity to run helper thread 1 on CPU core #6 [Worker #2 Mar 13 13:47] Setting affinity to run helper thread 2 on CPU core #7 [Worker #2 Mar 13 13:47] Setting affinity to run helper thread 3 on CPU core #8 [Worker #2 Mar 13 13:47] Something went wrong with the assignatio of the CPUs at the worker threads...? or maybe it's just me. Luigi Last fiddled with by ET_ on 2021-03-13 at 12:52
2021-03-13, 13:50   #114
Happy5214

"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City

25916 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ET_ OK. Restarted with 30.5.1 a session initiated with 30.4.9, and had the following message: Code: [...] [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:46] Resuming trial factoring of M216166681 to 2^74 [...] [Worker #2 Mar 13 13:46] Setting affinity to run worker on CPU core #5 [Worker #2 Mar 13 13:46] Setting affinity to run helper thread 1 on CPU core #6 [Worker #2 Mar 13 13:46] Setting affinity to run helper thread 3 on CPU core #8 while with version 30.4.9 I had the following allorment for the CPUs: Code: [...] [Worker #1 Mar 13 13:47] Resuming trial factoring of M216166681 to 2^74 [...] [Worker #2 Mar 13 13:47] Setting affinity to run worker on CPU core #5 [Worker #2 Mar 13 13:47] Setting affinity to run helper thread 1 on CPU core #6 [Worker #2 Mar 13 13:47] Setting affinity to run helper thread 2 on CPU core #7 [Worker #2 Mar 13 13:47] Setting affinity to run helper thread 3 on CPU core #8 [Worker #2 Mar 13 13:47] Something went wrong with the assignatio of the CPUs at the worker threads...? or maybe it's just me.
The only difference I can see (apart from the line ordering) is that 30.5 is missing helper thread 2 on worker #2 (which I've clipped your log to in the quote). And of course there's the obligatory question of why you're doing TF on a CPU.

Last fiddled with by Happy5214 on 2021-03-13 at 13:53

2021-03-13, 14:23   #115
ATH
Einyen

Dec 2003
Denmark

31·101 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Happy5214 And of course there's the obligatory question of why you're doing TF on a CPU.
Because the PRP-CF-DC category is getting TF assignments right now when there are no DCs.

2021-03-13, 14:37   #116
Happy5214

"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City

25916 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ATH Because the PRP-CF-DC category is getting TF assignments right now when there are no DCs.
Still? I thought George fixed that. I've been following since my computers run that work type and received TFs as well, but they were queued far enough in advance that I still have a couple of days worth of PRPs before I run out.

Last fiddled with by Happy5214 on 2021-03-13 at 14:40

2021-03-13, 16:04   #117
ET_
Banned

"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia

2×29×83 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Happy5214 Still? I thought George fixed that. I've been following since my computers run that work type and received TFs as well, but they were queued far enough in advance that I still have a couple of days worth of PRPs before I run out.
I usually get 3 days of work in advance, that's why there was that single TF range on my worktodo

2021-03-13, 16:18   #118
Happy5214

"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City

601 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ET_ I usually get 3 days of work in advance, that's why there was that single TF range on my worktodo
I cut mine back to 1 day ahead and released the TFs. Two of the machines were only attached to GIMPS for the PRP-CF-DC backlog clearing push. They normally run clients for my personal PRPNet servers, and they're slated to resume that work once their queues dry up. I haven't decided what I'll do with the third (by far the most powerful). I have a few backlogged P-1 and ECM exponents to run, but I don't know if I'll do first-time PRP-CF or start BOINC work after that (which was the original plan post-clearing).

2021-03-13, 16:23   #119
ATH
Einyen

Dec 2003
Denmark

313110 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Happy5214 Still? I thought George fixed that. I've been following since my computers run that work type and received TFs as well, but they were queued far enough in advance that I still have a couple of days worth of PRPs before I run out.
Fix is not working, I'm still getting TF just now.

 2021-03-13, 16:33 #120 Happy5214     "Alexander" Nov 2008 The Alamo City 25916 Posts On a completely unrelated note, my PRP-CF-DC test of 10841147 somehow ran without even attempting to generate a proof. It's not a big deal, since it was a DC and the residues matched, but this is the first time I recall this happening since I switched to 30.3 (of which I was an early adopter). I don't know if the worktodo line was wrong (it's complete, so the line is gone), but I didn't see anything unusual in the log files. But it didn't even attempt to create a residue file at the beginning of the test, and it sent periodic residues like in the pre-proof era. Actually, looking at the console printouts again, it didn't use Gerbicz on it either. I upgraded from 30.4 to 30.5 midway, but I don't think that had an impact, since 30.4 had already decided the test type (though strangely it did lower the FFT lengths back to 560K from 576K on those tests). Edit: From my laptop, here's the printout line: Code: [Worker #1 Mar 13 02:16] Starting PRP test of M10841147/24023981753 using FMA3 FFT length 576K, Pass1=384, Pass2=1536, clm=2, 2 threads Edit 2: Oh, now I see what happened. Some clown did the first-time test as a type-1 instead of a type-5. Would I get first-time or DC credit if I redid that as a type-5 with proof? Last fiddled with by Happy5214 on 2021-03-13 at 16:39 Reason: Explanation
2021-03-13, 18:26   #121
Viliam Furik

"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia

45610 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Happy5214 Edit 2: Oh, now I see what happened. Some clown did the first-time test as a type-1 instead of a type-5. Would I get first-time or DC credit if I redid that as a type-5 with proof?
I think you would get a credit.