20201001, 12:10  #452 
"Yves"
Jul 2017
Belgium
3·17 Posts 
Thanks for the check and the solution !

20201001, 13:26  #453 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
exNorthern Ontario
31·103 Posts 
Data has finished reimporting.

20201004, 10:45  #454 
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
10110010000_{2} Posts 
No data as of 04/10/2020 11:45 GMT.

20201004, 11:54  #455 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
exNorthern Ontario
110001111001_{2} Posts 

20201004, 12:59  #456 
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
2^{4}·89 Posts 
It is, indeed.

20201008, 22:14  #457 
Aug 2020
3×5×7 Posts 
Interpretation of min. TF on mersenne.ca
Minimal TF effort aka "min. TF" as shown in the factor entry seems to be quite different from the efforts shown in the TF history entry. For example, for M113317913 the "min. TF" shows 8.4409 GHz.d, whereas the total effort up to 2^{73} is already roughly 8.4409*2, and the TF effort in 7374 bits is greater than 8.4409GHzdays too, considering the fact that the factor is close to 2^74.
This couldn't be correct, unless the GHzdays in the factor entry and in the TF history are calibrated differently (which is also confusing). Last fiddled with by VBCurtis on 20201009 at 00:10 
20201008, 22:28  #458 
Aug 2020
105_{10} Posts 
Also there‘s another thing in the TF history of M113317913 that perplexes me. Its factor 18823632331491929056447 is so close to 74 bits (73.995), but the GHzdays shown is much less than the TF effort of the whole 7374 bits range, which should be 2 times the TF effort of 7273 bits.

20201009, 00:09  #459 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
4499_{10} Posts 
What is confusing about doing more than "minimal"? Minimal != recommended.

20201009, 01:12  #460  
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
exNorthern Ontario
31·103 Posts 
Quote:
That said, the 8.44 number does look suspiciously low, I will take deeper look at it in the morning and check if the calculations are correct or not. 

20201009, 08:46  #461 
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
2^{2}×2,239 Posts 
Numbers look right for me. That's a tinny factor for a large exponent.

20201009, 09:19  #462  
Aug 2020
3·5·7 Posts 
Quote:
Thanks for explaining it, I really didn't know that. 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Small inconsistencies between mersenne.org and mersenne.ca factor databases  GP2  mersenne.ca  44  20160619 19:29 
mersenne.ca (ex mersennearies.sili.net)  LaurV  mersenne.ca  8  20131125 21:01 
GaussianMersenne & EisensteinMersenne primes  siegert81  Math  2  20110919 17:36 
Mersenne Wiki: Improving the mersenne primes web site by FOSS methods  optim  PrimeNet  13  20040709 13:51 