mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Miscellaneous Math

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2021-05-29, 04:45   #1
sweety439
 
sweety439's Avatar
 
"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36

5×7×89 Posts
Default I am curious why someone won't do what I want

Lucas(148091) is certificated to be prime in September 2015 (see prime pages), but why no one certificate Fibonacci(148091)? Fibonacci(148091) is smaller than Lucas(148091), and 148091 may be the largest n such that Fibonacci(n) and Lucas(n) are both primes.

Last fiddled with by sweety439 on 2021-05-29 at 04:45
sweety439 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-05-29, 05:31   #2
paulunderwood
 
paulunderwood's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr

5×787 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sweety439 View Post
Lucas(148091) is certificated to be prime in September 2015 (see prime pages), but why no one certificate Fibonacci(148091)? Fibonacci(148091) is smaller than Lucas(148091), and 148091 may be the largest n such that Fibonacci(n) and Lucas(n) are both primes.
These numbers take months if not years of certification on dedicated hardware. Maybe you could invest some time and money in the endeavors to provide such proofs instead of squawking about how pitiful our hard efforts have been.
paulunderwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-02, 07:07   #3
sweety439
 
sweety439's Avatar
 
"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36

5×7×89 Posts
Default I am curious why someone won't do what I want

I am curious that why none has reserved the Wagstaff number (2^95369+1)/3, it has only 28709 digits, much smaller than the partition number Partition(1289844341) (40000 digits), which is already reserved and proven to be prime (see http://www.ellipsa.eu/public/primo/top20.html), and Wagstaff numbers are much more important (and seems to be easier to be proven prime) than partition numbers.
sweety439 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-02, 07:23   #4
paulunderwood
 
paulunderwood's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr

75378 Posts
Default

More attacks on our hard efforts! "Only 28709 digits" -- have you tried running Primo, even at 10k digits? it is O(log(n)^(4+eps)). It is not trivial to do such certifications. It is absurd to say that Wagstaff is "much more important" than a partition number. The latter has greater entropy and show off the effectiveness of ECPP. There are couple of aims here: big ECPP and proving classic top20 PRPs. We aim to do both. Please stop harping on about our efforts and start doing some Primo work.

Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2021-06-02 at 07:43
paulunderwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-04, 03:17   #5
sweety439
 
sweety439's Avatar
 
"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36

1100001010112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paulunderwood View Post
More attacks on our hard efforts! "Only 28709 digits" -- have you tried running Primo, even at 10k digits? it is O(log(n)^(4+eps)). It is not trivial to do such certifications. It is absurd to say that Wagstaff is "much more important" than a partition number. The latter has greater entropy and show off the effectiveness of ECPP. There are couple of aims here: big ECPP and proving classic top20 PRPs. We aim to do both. Please stop harping on about our efforts and start doing some Primo work.
I only have Windows10, and there is no Windows version for Primo.
sweety439 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-04, 06:05   #6
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

59×163 Posts
Default

https://www.techradar.com/best/best-...chine-software
go. read.
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-04, 06:21   #7
kar_bon
 
kar_bon's Avatar
 
Mar 2006
Germany

24·3·61 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sweety439 View Post
I only have Windows10, and there is no Windows version for Primo.
You can download Primo 3.0.9 from my page running under WIN, so you get an idea, how long a certificate would take for a 'only' 5000 digit number.
Sure this version is slower than the current one, but try it.

Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 2021-06-15 at 01:15 Reason: Generalized the link.
kar_bon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-04, 06:34   #8
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

32×577 Posts
Default

Option 1 - Install WSL2 inside Windows 10
Option 2 - Install a linux as dual boot.
axn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-04, 11:02   #9
sweety439
 
sweety439's Avatar
 
"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36

C2B16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kar_bon View Post
You can download Primo 3.0.9 from my page running under WIN, so you get an idea, how long a certificate would take for a 'only' 5000 digit number.
Sure this version is slower than the current one, but try it.
I want to run these numbers to prove my Sierpinski and Riesel conjectures:

S73: (14*73^21369+1)/3 (may be too large)
S105: (191*105^5045+1)/8
S256: (11*256^5702+1)/3

R7: (197*7^181761-1)/2 and (367*7^15118-1)/6 (may be too large)
R73: (79*73^9339-1)/6
R91: (27*91^5048-1)/2
R100: (133*100^5496-1)/33
R107: (3*107^4900-1)/2
sweety439 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-04, 11:56   #10
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"π’‰Ίπ’ŒŒπ’‡·π’†·π’€­"
May 2003
Down not across

101011000100112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sweety439 View Post
I want to run these numbers to prove ...
If you want to run them, please go ahead and run them. No-one will stop you.
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-06-04, 17:45   #11
mathwiz
 
Mar 2019

5·41 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sweety439 View Post
I want to run these numbers
Then you should acquire the necessary hardware/VM and software and run it yourself. Not sure why you expect others to do it for you?
mathwiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A curious asymmetry xilman Msieve 4 2014-11-03 17:22
Just curious houding Information & Answers 16 2014-07-19 08:32
Just curious... NBtarheel_33 Information & Answers 0 2011-02-20 09:07
Just curious.... schickel Lounge 13 2009-01-06 08:56
Curious about iteration Unregistered Software 3 2004-05-30 17:38

All times are UTC. The time now is 01:05.


Sun Dec 5 01:05:15 UTC 2021 up 134 days, 19:34, 0 users, load averages: 2.36, 2.28, 1.84

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.