mersenneforum.org Aliquot cycles search, the state of the art.
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2015-10-12, 07:07   #45
Sergei Chernykh

Jun 2015
Stockholm, Sweden

8310 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by AndrewWalker While ever Pat still has his site I plan to submit new pairs to both. I remember Jan used to send back with each submission a list of just the new pairs, would this be feasible (probably limited to something sensible like 5 MB if by email)? Then I could split these up and send them to Pat (for the BDE stuff I'm doing most found are known but go up to a longer length). I also have a record size pair over 40k digits I found with Paul Jobling a few years ago which was sent to Jan but never processed. Sometime I'll dig it out and test both pages with it!!! Andrew
I haven't set up a mail server yet. I can however build a file with just the new pairs when processing a submission and then give a download link to it. Actually, it's a good idea - to log all submissions this way. I'll try it this evening. My scripts should handle 40,000 digit numbers, _if_ they don't exceed execution time limit.

2015-10-13, 04:49   #46
Sergei Chernykh

Jun 2015
Stockholm, Sweden

83 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by AndrewWalker I remember Jan used to send back with each submission a list of just the new pairs, would this be feasible (probably limited to something sensible like 5 MB if by email)?
It works now: http://sech.me/ap/news.html

 2015-10-13, 09:07 #47 AndrewWalker     Mar 2015 Australia 2×41 Posts Thanks! I'll test it out over the next few days. Andrew
 2015-10-17, 15:42 #48 Sergei Chernykh   Jun 2015 Stockholm, Sweden 8310 Posts New record even-even pair with smallest known m/n ratio found: Code: X73 Chernykh 2015 523445399739689350=2*5^2*7*11*17*31*37*73*191*500083 865023542517044858=2*31*37*107*63487*55509323 The ratio is ~0.60512272, previous record ratio was ~0.6468 for the pair (35049418250,54192685558) Last fiddled with by Sergei Chernykh on 2015-10-17 at 15:46
2015-10-21, 10:42   #49
AndrewWalker

Mar 2015
Australia

2·41 Posts

I've just added the record pair I mentioned, it took a few days to recover it as I had a record
of the input that produced it but not of the actual pair!

The pair has been submitted to both databases

It's 43145 digits.

Andrew
Attached Files
 Record.txt (126.6 KB, 75 views)

2015-10-21, 10:56   #50
Sergei Chernykh

Jun 2015
Stockholm, Sweden

83 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by AndrewWalker I've just added the record pair I mentioned, it took a few days to recover it as I had a record of the input that produced it but not of the actual pair! The pair has been submitted to both databases It's 43145 digits. Andrew
Congratulations! My database automatically marked it as discovered in 2015, but if you remember when it was actually found, I can fix it.

2015-10-21, 10:58   #51
AndrewWalker

Mar 2015
Australia

2×41 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Sergei Chernykh Congratulations! My database automatically marked it as discovered in 2015, but if you remember when it was actually found, I can fix it.
It was back in 2011. (26 September just for the record. The primes were also checked using PFGW with p-1 or p+1 tests which give a 100% verification)

Andrew

Last fiddled with by AndrewWalker on 2015-10-21 at 11:02

2015-10-21, 11:07   #52
Sergei Chernykh

Jun 2015
Stockholm, Sweden

1238 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by AndrewWalker It was back in 2011. (26 September just for the record. The primes were also checked using PFGW with p-1 or p+1 tests which give a 100% verification) Andrew
OK, I'll update the database this evening.

 2015-10-24, 04:48 #53 RenYuanhua   "Ren Yuanhua" Oct 2015 Guangzhou,China 410 Posts join in to forum & submission Hello, friends of AP search-er. so glad to see again an AP-database updata daily, I submit my calculate result list relate-new to JMP last update in 2007 to the new AP-database by Sergei Chernykh, with 102460 pairs. statistics as follow, total: 102460 Digits 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 : 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 10 : 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 244, 2710, 3902, 4563, 5373, 20 : 6088, 6631, 6841, 7277, 7126, 6737, 6385, 5900, 5433, 4636, 30 : 3903, 3473, 2963, 2464, 1990, 1664, 1311, 1061, 794, 687, 40 : 535, 442, 315, 228, 209, 157, 140, 97, 79, 14, 50 : 5, 5, 8, 1, 5, 3, 0, 1, 1, 2, 60 : 2, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 4, 3, 5, 1, 70 : 4, 2, 4, 1, 0, 3, 1, 2, 1, 3, 80 : 0, 0, 2, 6, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 90 : 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 100 : 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 2, 0, 0, 1 pair with 135 digits regular j=1 j=2 j=3 j=4 j=5 j=6 j=7 j=8 j=9 , i= 1 : , , , , , , , , , , i= 2 : , 6, 225, 142, 6, , , , , , i= 3 : , 1237, 15334, 10740, 773, 12, , , , , i= 4 : , 7388, 30259, 12505, 986, 13, , , , , i= 5 : , 2274, 6094, 2652, 222, 4, , , , , i= 6 : , 177, 319, 123, 21, 1, , , , , i= 7 : , 6, 5, 3, , , , , , , i= 8 : , , , , , , , , , , i= 9 : , , , , , , , , , irregular j=1 j=2 j=3 j=4 j=5 j=6 j=7 j=8 j=9 , i= 0 : , , , , , , , , , , i= 1 : , 2, 5, , , , , , , , i= 2 : 8, 108, 980, 299, 18, , , , , , i= 3 : 17, 1234, 3287, 876, 53, , , , , , i= 4 : 1, 1110, 1733, 561, 39, , , , , , i= 5 : , 190, 287, 84, 7, , , , , , i= 6 : , 24, 8, 2, , , , , , , i= 7 : , , , , , , , , , , i= 8 : , , , , , , , , , , i= 9 : , , , , , , , , ,
 2015-10-24, 05:48 #54 RenYuanhua   "Ren Yuanhua" Oct 2015 Guangzhou,China 22 Posts error correct sorry, 2 pairs of APs of 107Digits is error in statistics, it should be 108 Digits both.
 2015-10-24, 07:07 #55 Batalov     "Serge" Mar 2008 Phi(3,3^1118781+1)/3 5×1,811 Posts Note to RenYuanhua: please do not start new threads with duplicate content.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Drdmitry Aliquot Sequences 25 2016-12-16 15:26 Drdmitry Aliquot Sequences 302 2016-05-11 02:17 schickel Aliquot Sequences 7 2013-02-08 01:33 Drdmitry Aliquot Sequences 0 2011-12-14 13:50 R. Gerbicz Math 0 2010-07-01 12:30

All times are UTC. The time now is 17:37.

Fri Jul 3 17:37:21 UTC 2020 up 100 days, 15:10, 2 users, load averages: 1.50, 1.75, 1.67