mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Aliquot Sequences

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2009-03-24, 13:25   #34
smh
 
smh's Avatar
 
"Sander"
Oct 2002
52.345322,5.52471

100101001012 Posts
Default

The next few lines are
Code:
2358. 1057740653513528086801031524122505337042976655048785727171419977827018427090800637622080490462747635590675389330380734966563569049887673822886448 = 2^4 * 37^2 * 61 * 139 * 811 * 3297913 * 89410075670231178255617408564064869 * 35002919043440598709446585389332582891704139 * 680393812683245718764884523503733114306839326481
2359. 1101106789466867190158699344258853149007026059881050048976079670039948004072162440268787484377092542354688034551613035367120271627951318370521552 = 2^4 * 59 * 89 * 139 * 809 * 8676141475920391931 * 5242696007384015650021 * 2562257755084747092444106045661085679031576535348519685064809828214204315874454304278737557347
2360. 1111338937559280653105967704696475530852725166022881880277270464264691375579242248013146222561793654859704139868691964652947247957345101468198448 = 2^4 * 47 * 181 * 211219840628893703 * 6752370963621275689 * 320157034060976985774276364002263071 * 17881175392493028213881459983631827728605211737115392212082434979897
2361. 1099842778336850112888388054783870080440778137370608244403348556935983252469359193252640108450630518144766769986533571350697202804014917630466512 = 2^4 * 3713807 * 95536018143098333729 * 12677902689255386517271648618421078537327 * 15281878558600307159671331751066153273008886018100828613108896319230955638397
2362. 1031103178480814347844647335693130540009680919276879210321284738494273557544345821526867225678615495548751496685206097793886598655487523752051248 = 2^4 * 163 * 4285339 * 21066232726885097
smh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-03-24, 17:30   #35
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT)

567410 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdettweiler View Post
Okay, I've tried that, with no other applications running, and got the exact same thing:

total yield: 2149, q=1900511 (0.00638 sec/rel)

BTW--I've got a taskbar gadget that reads out my CPU temperatures continuously and they're well below the throttle limit, so thermal throttling can be ruled out as the cause of any problems.

Edit: Oh, wait! I just realized what's going on. henryzz, are you by chance using the 64-bit version of gnfs-lasieve4I12e? I'm using the 32-bit version, which of course is about half as fast--so that would explain the discrepancy perfectly.
no i was using 32-bit
henryzz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-03-24, 17:47   #36
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

3×2,083 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by henryzz View Post
no i was using 32-bit
Hmm...that's very strange then. Maybe somehow I'm not using a GGNFS binary that has the assembly code enabled? I built my GGNFS binaries myself, with just a plain old "make" command, no special stuff enabled. Is that the problem?

If so, how would I go about compiling/obtaining GGNFS binaries for 32-bit Linux that have the assembly code enabled?
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-03-24, 17:48   #37
10metreh
 
10metreh's Avatar
 
Nov 2008

232210 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smh View Post
The next few lines are
Code:
2358. 1057740653513528086801031524122505337042976655048785727171419977827018427090800637622080490462747635590675389330380734966563569049887673822886448 = 2^4 * 37^2 * 61 * 139 * 811 * 3297913 * 89410075670231178255617408564064869 * 35002919043440598709446585389332582891704139 * 680393812683245718764884523503733114306839326481
2359. 1101106789466867190158699344258853149007026059881050048976079670039948004072162440268787484377092542354688034551613035367120271627951318370521552 = 2^4 * 59 * 89 * 139 * 809 * 8676141475920391931 * 5242696007384015650021 * 2562257755084747092444106045661085679031576535348519685064809828214204315874454304278737557347
2360. 1111338937559280653105967704696475530852725166022881880277270464264691375579242248013146222561793654859704139868691964652947247957345101468198448 = 2^4 * 47 * 181 * 211219840628893703 * 6752370963621275689 * 320157034060976985774276364002263071 * 17881175392493028213881459983631827728605211737115392212082434979897
2361. 1099842778336850112888388054783870080440778137370608244403348556935983252469359193252640108450630518144766769986533571350697202804014917630466512 = 2^4 * 3713807 * 95536018143098333729 * 12677902689255386517271648618421078537327 * 15281878558600307159671331751066153273008886018100828613108896319230955638397
2362. 1031103178480814347844647335693130540009680919276879210321284738494273557544345821526867225678615495548751496685206097793886598655487523752051248 = 2^4 * 163 * 4285339 * 21066232726885097
..leaving a t35-ed C118. I reckon we should do about 1/4 of the 40-digit level, i.e. roughly 600 curves, then give it a GNFS. Any opinions?

Last fiddled with by 10metreh on 2009-03-24 at 17:49
10metreh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-03-24, 18:42   #38
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

3×2,083 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 10metreh View Post
..leaving a t35-ed C118. I reckon we should do about 1/4 of the 40-digit level, i.e. roughly 600 curves, then give it a GNFS. Any opinions?
Sounds good to me. Would anyone here be interested in pre-reserving the C118 GNFS (assuming that we don't find a factor in the remaining ECM work left to be done)? It would probably be a bit too small to make a group GNFS effort worthwhile.

I'll be glad to do the poly selection (with msieve v1.40) portion of the job, though probably not the whole thing (which would tie up my resources for a solid couple of days).
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-03-24, 19:05   #39
10metreh
 
10metreh's Avatar
 
Nov 2008

2·33·43 Posts
Default

We have about 230 curves left on the C118 thanks to someone (Max?) giving it a good go on Syd's workers. Much easier!

I'm going to donate some curves myself, but even at normal priority, one curve takes about 1 minute 45 seconds.
10metreh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-03-24, 19:13   #40
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

3·2,083 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 10metreh View Post
We have about 230 curves left on the C118 thanks to someone (Max?) giving it a good go on Syd's workers. Much easier!

I'm going to donate some curves myself, but even at normal priority, one curve takes about 1 minute 45 seconds.
Yes, that was me running the C118 on the workers. In fact, they just popped out a nice P37:
I'll continue to run this sequence on the workers until a number survives full ECM. If anyone wants to donate a few curves along the way, be sure to submit them to Syd's database so we can keep track of them easily.

Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2009-03-24 at 19:13 Reason: typo
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-03-24, 19:18   #41
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

11000011010012 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdettweiler View Post
Yes, that was me running the C118 on the workers. In fact, they just popped out a nice P37:
I'll continue to run this sequence on the workers until a number survives full ECM. If anyone wants to donate a few curves along the way, be sure to submit them to Syd's database so we can keep track of them easily.
10metreh, is that you who seems to be colliding with me a bit as far as who's pushing the buttons for the workers right now? FYI, I usually like to run TF to 1e7 and then a few ECM low limits runs *before* going to ECM very high limits.
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-03-24, 19:35   #42
mklasson
 
Feb 2004

2×3×43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdettweiler View Post
10metreh, is that you who seems to be colliding with me a bit as far as who's pushing the buttons for the workers right now? FYI, I usually like to run TF to 1e7 and then a few ECM low limits runs *before* going to ECM very high limits.
Looking at http://factorization.ath.cx/search.php?id=27203989 P-1 has been run 5 times at B1=3e7 now. Is someone pushing too many buttons? Or are the workers doing it automatically?
mklasson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-03-24, 19:36   #43
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

3×2,083 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mklasson View Post
Looking at http://factorization.ath.cx/search.php?id=27203989 P-1 has been run 5 times at B1=3e7 now. Is someone pushing too many buttons? Or are the workers doing it automatically?
The workers automatically run P-1 once every time ECM very high limits is started. Thus, if a very high limits run is interrupted and has to be restarted a couple of times, then the P-1 and P+1 will start to pile up.
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-03-24, 19:37   #44
10metreh
 
10metreh's Avatar
 
Nov 2008

1001000100102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdettweiler View Post
10metreh, is that you who seems to be colliding with me a bit as far as who's pushing the buttons for the workers right now? FYI, I usually like to run TF to 1e7 and then a few ECM low limits runs *before* going to ECM very high limits.
Not me anymore really - someone is clearly using them for most of their aliquot sequence work.

I reckon t35 (or maybe slightly less) for the current C112.
10metreh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reserved for MF - Sequence 3366 RichD Aliquot Sequences 406 2020-06-10 03:10
Primes in n-fibonacci sequence and n-step fibonacci sequence sweety439 And now for something completely different 17 2017-06-13 03:49
ECM for c166 from 4788:2661 frmky Aliquot Sequences 36 2011-04-28 06:27
ECM work on 4788:2549.c170 schickel Aliquot Sequences 51 2011-01-05 02:32
80M to 64 bits ... but not really reserved petrw1 Lone Mersenne Hunters 82 2010-01-11 01:57

All times are UTC. The time now is 16:42.

Fri Jul 3 16:42:30 UTC 2020 up 100 days, 14:15, 2 users, load averages: 1.24, 1.39, 1.45

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.