mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Blogorrhea > storflyt32

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2020-05-23, 00:20   #122
storflyt32
 
Feb 2013

7·61 Posts
Default

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001508546635

Should tell that this is a quite heavy one, for that of number, because here it blew the other way, for just a flipover, and here during the week.

But not any reported either, at least from only my side.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001364192184

Here is the familiar number we should be aware of, for just knowing, when that of a "slingshot" number here.

Anyway, I did not try here, from just a recall, but the product of this number should be at least composite, for still not any remainder, when only a flipover for such.

So, just "stupidity killed the cat", for only the other project I could make it, and next only looking around, for only the blow it still could be, when only just knowing.

Just "hi there", and next I could be only sitting here, for only a way to produce, when also deliver, for not any sentence it should be either.

Always the remainder it could be, when also that of a leftover, but for that, we only could be testing a number for that of primality when only such.

I better report the factors, for still just knowing, when also that of possession for just the same.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001510523351

And this one just blew, for only a SIQS for such, meaning that I could be having the factors.

Here a P42 and P43 respectively, and it is a beautiful pair, for only one digit difference in size.

Notice the P38 for just before or preceding, and it becomes quite clear that this is a tight one here for that of pair.

Maybe updating here before I go to bed.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001512173531

P38 = 11177730913469814457434179537581152881

Flips around for that of a P166 when only multiplying here, for that of a loose factor, already known.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001516040929

And here making an entry which in fact is not needed, for only superfluous for such.

Apologies for that.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001512173531


Should tell that I did not know or report the factors here, but only that they were already known.

Therefore redoing here for just orders sake, and it took a little while.

But next, on the other hand, for not any nextprime() it should be either, next I could end up being a jerk for only nonsense for such.

Always the bigger and better, for also a number for such, and next you could sieve, for only extract by only doing so.

Those numbers in between should be almost countless, for also indeterminate as well, and for that, also a lack of being able to quantize, for only the numbers it could be.

So here not just a number in itself, but rather an amount instead, meaning that you should count it separate here.

Just picking a P92 by chance, for also a P38, and it should be a C130 or so, and next it could flip over, for that of the "rest".

Here need scrolling down a little, for perhaps a couple of samples, and next I have not tried it either.

Only exclude 2 perhaps for just a factor on one side, and you could be still left with that of the remaining part of it for just task, when only that of the rest.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001517236724

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001516776946

Here keying in the product or composite factor before the first one just above, so here in error once again.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001517236310

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001517241344

Again my apologies for that, but here again two separate factorizations, making for loose factors here, so why it ends up better at times, I really do not know.

The P41 was already known here, but more that it flips around quite nice here, and next back to the C120.

And not doing that one either, because suspecting it could be quite some bit difficult.

Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2020-05-30 at 19:02
storflyt32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Previous Miss? R.D. Silverman GMP-ECM 4 2009-11-14 19:57
Using long long's in Mingw with 32-bit Windows XP grandpascorpion Programming 7 2009-10-04 12:13
I think it's gonna be a long, long time panic Hardware 9 2009-09-11 05:11
UPDATED: The current pre-sieved range reservation thread and stats page gribozavr Twin Prime Search 10 2007-01-19 21:06
Ram allocation (in Re: previous thread) JuanTutors Marin's Mersenne-aries 1 2004-08-29 17:23

All times are UTC. The time now is 11:31.

Thu Jun 4 11:31:21 UTC 2020 up 71 days, 9:04, 0 users, load averages: 1.11, 1.27, 1.29

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.