20220502, 15:11  #166 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow
3×7^{2}×19 Posts 
Taking
93^75: 125/110 200^64: 139/116 
20220503, 20:15  #167 
Jun 2021
120_{10} Posts 
Taking 89^69

20220504, 14:33  #168 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow
3×7^{2}×19 Posts 
93^75 terminates with P104.

20220505, 10:01  #169 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow
3·7^{2}·19 Posts 
Taking 200^63 next
Upd: It is quickly terminates with P105. Last fiddled with by unconnected on 20220505 at 10:27 
20220506, 13:26  #170 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
11125_{8} Posts 
Someone (Anonymous) has been terminating whatever I add. I just added a few more, but my rate of adding is definitely slower than the rate of termination. Should I move the 140 digit threshold up a notch or two?
My original intent was to provide some easier terminations for those with lesser machine capabilities. I'm happy we brought in some newer members, but I think it will be more difficult to continue at this level. 
20220506, 16:06  #171  
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
2×463 Posts 
Quote:
That will be less computation time for you and more for the others, since they seem to be getting ahead of you. I don't know what others think ? 

20220506, 16:40  #172 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow
3×7^{2}×19 Posts 

20220506, 17:58  #173 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
1001001010101_{2} Posts 
Moving to a 145 digit threshold would be very simple from my point and would immediately give a fair number of new sequences to the first post. Perhaps I will do that this evening. Any smaller sequences that may still show up will still make the list.

20220506, 18:21  #174 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
11125_{8} Posts 
Actually, since I've been working with these sizes, taking them to 140, there aren't any left. I'm working at 147 digits already. However, I will shift my work to coincide with the new threshold starting now.

20220506, 19:00  #175 
"Garambois JeanLuc"
Oct 2011
France
2×463 Posts 
OK, I think that's a good decision.
We'll see how it goes. 
20220506, 22:01  #176 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
13·19^{2} Posts 
For fun, I plan to add 1152 and 1250 bases to the listings, even though they aren't yet added to the project pages. This should supply some really trivial sequences and we may even get the bases fully initialized somewhat quickly so they can be added.
I have chosen these two bases because they are unreserved and are the next two doubled square bases. This means that all the sequences for the tables should terminate, unless we find another rare openended one. I will hold all the terminations listed in this thread until such time as the tables can be added to the project. I'm hoping this won't be too labor intensive and will provide some easy sequences again, as well as helping out the project. Depending on the success/failure of this trial, I may add in the next sets of double square bases later on. 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Unexpected termination of PM1  Miszka  Software  22  20211119 21:36 
Easier pi(x) approximation  mathPuzzles  Math  8  20170504 10:58 
Would finding a definate Pi value easier if...  xtreme2k  Math  34  20130909 23:54 
Aliquot Termination Question  Largest Prime?  EdH  Aliquot Sequences  6  20100406 00:12 
A new termination below 100k  10metreh  Aliquot Sequences  0  20100311 18:24 