mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2020-05-11, 19:43   #1805
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

219816 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
Seconded.

Another (IMO more serious) issue is the 1002 assignments in the "Cat 1" 91M range.

The assignee, SRS Technology, has some compute behind him. But these need to be worked in the next few days, or else expired. He's about to hoard from the LL'ers.
Cat 1 expiration is still turned off due to COVID and access to hardware issues. This hasn't stopped poaching in both the FT and DC ranges. A bunch of exponents that were on inaccessible machines have been poached.
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-05-13, 22:38   #1806
lycorn
 
lycorn's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal

57716 Posts
Default

PrimeNet Activity Summary Report appears to be stuck at 2020-05-13 12:00 UTC.

Correction: it is just the header. The figures seem to be updating properly.

Last fiddled with by lycorn on 2020-05-13 at 23:08
lycorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-05-13, 23:23   #1807
Viliam Furik
 
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia

8116 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S485122 View Post
IMO once an exponent is in CAT 2, but even more in CAT 1 it should not possible to assign it for manual testing and certainly not for trial factoring.

Jacob
I don't see a reason, why these exponents shouldn't be available to TF. They are already double-checked, and thus out of DC Cat 0. I think of TF on double-checked numbers as an even slower running wave of proving composite - it's Cat 0 lowest exponent is 1277, and it will probably be for a long time from now.
Viliam Furik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-05-13, 23:25   #1808
Viliam Furik
 
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia

3·43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lycorn View Post
PrimeNet Activity Summary Report appears to be stuck at 2020-05-13 12:00 UTC.

Correction: it is just the header. The figures seem to be updating properly.
I can confirm, (here) it is stuck on 12:00, but on all top producer lists it's working properly.
Viliam Furik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-05-14, 02:37   #1809
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

23·52·43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viliam Furik View Post
I don't see a reason, why these exponents shouldn't be available to TF. They are already double-checked, and thus out of DC Cat 0. I think of TF on double-checked numbers as an even slower running wave of proving composite - it's Cat 0 lowest exponent is 1277, and it will probably be for a long time from now.
No, they haven't been DC'ed.
https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...exp_hi=&full=1
It has one LL, not 2. The level of numbers that it makes sense to do any more TF is higher than 1277. Some would have factors found with bigger P-1. But, lower ones should have ECM done before pulling out the big factoring guns out.
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-05-14, 13:42   #1810
S485122
 
S485122's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium

1,571 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viliam Furik View Post
I don't see a reason, why these exponents shouldn't be available to TF. They are already double-checked, and thus out of DC Cat 0. I think of TF on double-checked numbers as an even slower running wave of proving composite - it's Cat 0 lowest exponent is 1277, and it will probably be for a long time from now.
I referred to numbers in the Categories as defined on the Thresholds page : https://www.mersenne.org/thresholds/.

Is it possible you confused this thread with the one about getting to less than 2000 unfactored numbers "Thinking out loud about getting under 20M unfactored exponents " ?

I do hope that that project will not work in the three lowest categories of both ranges because it would impede the progress (advances towards the completion of milestones) of GIMPS. Feel free to work on exponents that are already verified (successfully double-checked) in those ranges though.

Jacob
S485122 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-05-14, 15:51   #1811
Viliam Furik
 
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia

3·43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
No, they haven't been DC'ed.
https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...exp_hi=&full=1
It has one LL, not 2.
My mistake, they were higher in the list, and my brain didn't bother to properly check that the exponents are smaller than those which are being DC'ed - they are higher, thus they are not under smallest to-be-DC'ed exponent. I guess there should be an error-check for the human brain... It would solve a lot of problems!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
The level of numbers that it makes sense to do any more TF is higher than 1277. Some would have factors found with bigger P-1. But, lower ones should have ECM done before pulling out the big factoring guns out.
I know, but 1277 is the lowest non-factored exponent, so it can be viewed as the lowest Cat 0 exponent of the AMFF (Absolute Mersenne Factoring Front).
Viliam Furik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-05-19, 16:20   #1812
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

873610 Posts
Default

Grrrr.... I want my candies!

Quote:
processing: LL for M101998087
Error: Checksum (70FblahB1) does not match! Please check the results line carefully.
Email woltman@blah.blah.edu if you cannot find the problem.
This is V29.1 build 15, untouched, legal (i.e. we didn't do any trick!)

Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2020-05-19 at 16:22
LaurV is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-05-19, 16:33   #1813
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

2·1,511 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurV View Post
Error: Checksum (70FblahB1) does not match! Please check the results line carefully.
PM me the result line in question, please?
James Heinrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-05-19, 16:41   #1814
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

25×3×7×13 Posts
Default

Done.
LaurV is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-05-19, 19:40   #1815
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

4,421 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurV View Post
This is V29.1 build 15, untouched, legal (i.e. we didn't do any trick!)
That's a long way from current (2017; V29.8b6 is from 2019 and current). Why the old version?
Also you've already reported a 0-shift LL result for that same exponent, perhaps from gpuowl. And the bits of unmasked residue do not match.

Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2020-05-19 at 19:44
kriesel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official "Faits erronés dans de belles-lettres" thread ewmayer Lounge 39 2015-05-19 01:08
Official "all-Greek-to-me Fiction Literature and Cinema" Thread ewmayer Science & Technology 41 2014-04-16 11:54
Official "Lasciate ogne speranza" whinge-thread cheesehead Soap Box 56 2013-06-29 01:42
Official "Ernst is a deceiving bully and George is a meanie" thread cheesehead Soap Box 61 2013-06-11 04:30
Official "String copy Statement Considered Harmful" thread Dubslow Programming 19 2012-05-31 17:49

All times are UTC. The time now is 07:36.

Wed Sep 23 07:36:47 UTC 2020 up 13 days, 4:47, 0 users, load averages: 1.79, 2.26, 2.25

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.