View Single Post
Old 2005-11-13, 13:13   #3
T.Rex's Avatar
Feb 2004

929 Posts

Originally Posted by T.Rex
I've checked only with some q primes (109, 103, 101, 97, 83, 37, 13, 7) , but it seems that ...
This is stupid. It is the definition of d being a divisor of Mq. (I should learn more elementary Number Theory, spend more time searching by my-self, and thus say less garbage on this forum. Isn't it, Bob ?)

What about the property in first post of this thread ?
(This property is not mine. So it is probably less stupid than my own tries.)

(In the examples, \large (M_q)/2 should be: \large (M_q-1)/2.)

T.Rex is offline   Reply With Quote