View Single Post
Old 2006-01-04, 09:36   #6
Numbers's Avatar
Jun 2005
Near Beetlegeuse

22×97 Posts

Originally Posted by cheesehead
But why is 5 the minimum universal exponent
I think you will find that Mr Kanadadai meant that where 2^x - 1 = y, the minimum universal exponent is the lowest positive x that makes y congruent to 0(mod 31), not 0(mod y).

I think this is a consequence of the corollary he mentioned in his previous post
Originally Posted by devarajkandadai
(2^x) + 29: this function of x is a multiple of 31...
I'm not saying I follow his argument, or even agree with him. I'm just offering to clarify what I think he said.
Numbers is offline   Reply With Quote