View Single Post
Old 2017-09-19, 08:29   #3
VBCurtis
 
VBCurtis's Avatar
 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

2×3×859 Posts
Default

Is it possible the new matrix was easier in part because you chose lower alim/rlim for your 16e run than NFS@home chose for 15e?

I've been wondering how (if?) matrix size scales with alim/rlim choice, holding LP and input difficulty fixed. Specifically, wondering if some of the jobs presently going to 14e with alim = 268M would produce smaller matrices on 15e with alim = 134M or thereabouts.
VBCurtis is offline   Reply With Quote