View Single Post
 2011-09-24, 23:02 #1 patrik     "Patrik Johansson" Aug 2002 Uppsala, Sweden 52×17 Posts Residue not matching due to masked bits I just did a successful double-check of 33238477 with residue D12F51397BCA233C. There is also a bad result for this exponent with residue D12F51397BCA23__ (by Daniel Weijand, computer name C7364A0E9). It is obvious that this result is not really a bad result, but somehow the masked bits made it into the database. I looked in some old status files that I have kept, and the result of the first test looks like Code: 33238477,S67532,C7364A0E9,W?, in the hrf3 file. In cleared.txt it was reported as Code: 33238477 69 0xD12F51397BCA23__ 01-Sep-03 14:16 S67532 C7364A0E9 The double check was done right after that with hrf3 line Code: 33238477,S01167,laptop,WZ1,00000000 and Code: 33238477 69 D 0xD12F51397BCA23__ 11-Nov-03 03:17 DL laptop in cleared.txt. Does anybody know what has happened?