View Single Post
Old 2008-05-16, 19:47   #2
ewmayer
2ω=0
 
ewmayer's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Rep├║blica de California

267208 Posts
Default

You mean the whole "instead of doing everything possible to frustrate international aid efforts and let the army steal the aid that does arrive, here's a radical idea: let's actually try helping the victims!" thing?

If ever there were justification for a "humanitarian regime change", Myanmar is it - but because of Bush's regime-change misadventures in the middle east, I'm afraid it's a no-no for the U.S. to consider it, and no other country will take the risk. Also, humanitarian regime change appears to fall way outside the UN's current purview - unprecedented actions have that quality, you'll never get a bunch of UN bureaucrats to go out on a limb like that. These are the same folks who only recognize genocide in hindsight, after all.

Last fiddled with by ewmayer on 2008-05-16 at 19:47
ewmayer is offline   Reply With Quote