View Single Post
Old 2021-06-17, 12:11   #52
charybdis
 
charybdis's Avatar
 
Apr 2020

379 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bur View Post
Ok, I found another C159 from an aliquot sequence. I'm finishing ECM on it and then go with the 0.02 and 140M.

Btw, is there anything else to be done on the c159 or c164, such as target_density? Otherwise I'd clear the space for that next job.
I'd hold off on this c159 - given this, I strongly suspect it's one that I've already factored. In which case I might as well provide the relevant data...

Code:
tasks.I = 14
tasks.qmin = 7000000
tasks.lim0 = 25000000
tasks.lim1 = 45000000
tasks.lpb0 = 31
tasks.lpb1 = 31
tasks.sieve.mfb0 = 58
tasks.sieve.mfb1 = 61
tasks.sieve.lambda0 = 2.07
tasks.sieve.lambda1 = 2.17
tasks.sieve.ncurves0 = 19
tasks.sieve.ncurves1 = 24
tasks.sieve.qrange = 10000
tasks.sieve.adjust_strategy = 2
4.77M CPU-seconds for sieving from Q=7M-43.2M.
Filtering with TD=90:

Code:
factoring 8162413651...0362934861 (159 digits)

skew 1612609.51, size 2.057e-15, alpha -5.963, combined = 1.761e-12 rroots = 5

found 47335431 hash collisions in 168523663 relations

found 57680004 duplicates and 110843659 unique relations

begin with 110843659 relations and 118457131 unique ideals

begin with 33364618 relations and 32436212 unique ideals
reduce to 33230023 relations and 32301540 ideals in 15 passes

matrix is 6559845 x 6560066 (2367.4 MB) with weight 618605783 (94.30/col)
163M relations (108M unique) were not enough to build a matrix.
charybdis is offline   Reply With Quote