mersenneforum.org - View Single Post

tetramur · 2019-01-20, 15:47

William Bouris claimed in his mad proofs, that:
"if p= 4*k+1, and q= 2*p+3 are both prime, then if [(M_r)^p-p] mod q == N, and q mod N == +/-1, then (M_r), the base, is prime. also, if (M_r) mod p = 1, then choose a different 'p' or if N is a square, then (M_r) is prime."
The source site has been broken about four months ago. How could this claim be proven/disproven?

2019-01-20, 15:47	#1
tetramur "unknown" Jan 2019 anywhere 17 Posts	New conjecture about Mersenne primes William Bouris claimed in his mad proofs, that: "if p= 4k+1, and q= 2p+3 are both prime, then if [(M_r)^p-p] mod q == N, and q mod N == +/-1, then (M_r), the base, is prime. also, if (M_r) mod p = 1, then choose a different 'p' or if N is a square, then (M_r) is prime." The source site has been broken about four months ago. How could this claim be proven/disproven?