View Single Post
2014-08-01, 17:22   #587
robert44444uk

Jun 2003
Oxford, UK

111111101112 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by robert44444uk This should have read 182/212228 This candidate is now at 186/250000 with a further one discovered at a higher n.
I gave up on this after a long primeless gap after 189/273212 and tested up to 345000. It is still one of only two candidate with 180 primes or more.

I have been working on a very impressive larger candidate:

R 240767517392458807 178 110/10000 125/20000 146/50000 158/100000 171/198000