Noodles
"Mr. Tuch"
Dec 2007
Chennai, India
4E9_{16} Posts

Operation DunningKrugerKrieg
If whether it is really being practically possible, indeed
Please pardon my own interruption. But as a collective team work & effort, will we be indeed
really be able to tackle away with RSA1024 in its place? It sounds rather like a drastic
jump to me,is to being for towards away quite directly from 203 digits within Mersenne Forum, 232 digits from within EPFL et al.
309 decimal digits. Remember this thing first place
Furthermore, what is being the fun in tackling away something for which we already know the
factors to be of both roughly equal in size?
I am not questioning for developments & improvements in GNFS polynomial selection tool, not
some need to eliminate away the small possible prime factors by using the Elliptic Curve
Method, etc.
If we go after some mathematical number, then we have got atleast some mystery already being
hidden behind, to know size of prime factors being hidden behind them, beneath, etc.
2,1277 being very much easier than RSA1024; SNFS 385 ≈ GNFS 269 < GNFS 309
(2,1237) SNFS 373 ?? not much of fun since one prime factor p70 is being revealed thereby
2,1123+ c338 no nonprimitive prime factors being known away at all for this thing, either
2,1117 c337
2,2042 L/M SNFS 308
13,269 c299
L1277 / L1279 c267 / c268
[COLOR=White]L1249, 3,607± being done away, either[/COLOR]
If RSA1024 seems to be too drastic a jump, you still need GNFS candidates, numbers alone,
as yet, also a little big enough, as well, then,
, then, there exist definitely numbers like
such as including with
RSA896 GNFS 270, not being a too drastic a jump, such as, like the RSA1024, GNFS 309 at all
EM48 GNFS 256
10,383+ c230, definitely GNFS, being available with lowest possible GNFS/SNFS ratio, among other Cunninghams, is somewhat being equivalent to RSA768 from within size & difficulty in terms
hardly only biggest GNFS being available with actually
to be being enough, is although,
, maybe next possible step for Mersenne Forum stage after B200 c203, etc.
not a sudden drastic jerk as well, including RSA1024 GNFS 309 at all
But still, RSA896 is being a very much jump too also, as well, as yet at all
as since there exist no intermediate RSA832, RSA960 at all, during first place
But potentially 10,383+ c230 maybe become a sudden ECM hit as well, after so many small
prime factors have been eliminated away for this thing by making usage for Elliptical curve method,
as well? For this thing, as well. Similar to things for 2,991± stuffs!
Or otherwise somebody maybe potentially try away in order to lead away with a somewhat practically potentially possible
challenging project probably  but perhaps try to finish away with Cunningham base 2 tables for 1000 bits
For this thing, as well, there exist alone 8 such items existing from within the + /  side,
as well,
2,929 2,947 2,991 2,947+ 2,961+ 2,983+ 2,989+ 2,991+
But 11 such things, as such, stuffs being pending away from within 2 LM side tables to be being potentially
enough
They are being listed away as follows
2,1846L 2,1874L 2,1894M 2,1898L 2,1898M 2,1906M 2,1934M 2,1942M 2,1954M 2,1978L 2,1982M
Last fiddled with by Raman on 20120725 at 08:29
