View Single Post
Old 2015-10-08, 03:58   #371
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

52·7·19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Rose View Post
As I understand it, the problem at hand is knowing how many unassigned exponents have no P-1, and what TF bit-level those exponents are at...
Do you guys need a list of suboptimally TF'd stuff that hasn't had any P-1 work (and is available)? Is that the main thing needed? I can't really help much with the rate at which things are being processed, but I can generate lists like this (just the top 50 here):
Code:
exponent	TFBits
80010001	73
80012903	71
80012917	71
80012923	71
80012957	71
80013163	72
80013253	72
80013257	72
80013347	71
80013397	72
80013749	71
80013827	71
80013877	71
80013979	71
80014027	71
80014537	71
80014601	71
80014663	71
80014673	71
80014703	72
80016107	71
80016121	71
80016199	71
80016281	71
80016359	71
80016613	71
80016623	71
80016647	71
80016667	71
80017087	71
80017097	71
80017099	71
80017187	71
80017243	71
80017627	71
80017649	71
80017739	71
80017837	71
80017871	71
80018023	72
80018041	72
80018327	72
80018333	72
80018377	72
80018381	72
80018767	71
80018857	72
80018933	72
80018963	72
80019227	72
PS - That's using this little bit of clause for TF bit levels... I didn't know what the 80M+ stuff would be, ideally, thus the 75 bit for everything 80M+

Code:
    ((exponent between    0 and  40e6 and no_factor_to_bits<71)
  OR (exponent between 40e6 and  50e6 and no_factor_to_bits<72)
  OR (exponent between 50e6 and  65e6 and no_factor_to_bits<73)
  OR (exponent between 65e6 and  80e6 and no_factor_to_bits<74)
  OR (exponent between 80e6 and 999e6 and no_factor_to_bits<75))

Last fiddled with by Madpoo on 2015-10-08 at 04:01
Madpoo is offline   Reply With Quote