View Single Post
Old 2020-09-23, 18:30   #7
De Wandelaar
 
De Wandelaar's Avatar
 
"Yves"
Jul 2017
Belgium

3·17 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
They should not be open to TF assignments. It should be DC only. If these are newbies (all of them are ranked less than 100 on the TF top producers list), they may not understand that they should not be working down there and holding on to the exponents. All the more reason to not allow them to take the exponents. They have moved up a bunch in the 90 day range. The highest, assuming a dead start 90 days ago is producing 708 GHz-days/day (which is less than a single GeForce GTX 1070).
Completely agree with your statement, those exponents should not be open to TF assignments.
Assignment algorithmm is not 100 % waterproof but again, participants are absolutely not at fault.

Do you think it's better to poach those exponents or to wait (worst case) for the 60 days expiry date ?

Edit : @ATH, I'm not convinced of deliberate attempts to stall but it's not impossible (??)

Last fiddled with by De Wandelaar on 2020-09-23 at 18:39
De Wandelaar is offline   Reply With Quote