View Single Post
Old 2020-10-09, 19:42   #12
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

5,807 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axn View Post
The figure of 91K is wrong. I think it is closer to 600K. James's site doesn't have P95 timing data for a FFT big enough to handle that exponent.
James has made use of extrapolated fft lengths and corresponding extrapolated iteration times to adjust those figures upward considerably. What was 91K is now ~700K.

Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2020-10-09 at 19:42
kriesel is online now   Reply With Quote