Thread: May 2021
View Single Post
Old 2021-05-02, 13:51   #3
Romulan Interpreter
LaurV's Avatar
"name field"
Jun 2011

100110010100002 Posts

Isn't (1) the same either way?

My "argument" with them is F0=1, which is wrong. Everybody knows F0=0 (otherwise the "only prime indexes can be prime" won't hold). In fact, how I always remember it is that the 5th fibo number is 5

In fact, they say as much, further when affirming that F3=2 and F11=89. If F0=1, those would be false.

Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2021-05-02 at 14:06
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote