View Single Post
Old 2020-10-17, 06:41   #140
storflyt32
 
Feb 2013

7018 Posts
Default

Perhaps a new one just here.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001585220649

But here still not any tested versus or against RSA-2048 here, for only the better it next could be, and pulling from the other end, for still only an extract just here.

Doing that tomorrow just here.

And for only a new start when also continuing, here my documents ended up at Google OneDrive as well, and could be adding factors from the laptop,
when the keyboard for the main computer broke, for also the spare ones I could have.

Here it downloads for just the mess it became when only becoming UTF-8 for still Windows (CRLF) when still only Notepad here.

Among the numbers for only factors just found, also a P154 having a syntax for quite a particularly good reading, and posted at PrimeGrid here.

P154 = 3540059347078761314664748238675668249978923993410111801988930640122798609020099356856644830266162476541379248990455576108055241155962671751878771348110017

Should tell that I had the Magic number dividing with a factor here, but next both ending up with 3, for that of 9 for only an ending, or product.

Here only so close, when also uneven, for that of a P103 versus P206 for only a recall, and next only far from the truth.

Doing so for also RSA-2048, and not any far away just here either, but next only unsuccessful for that of the larger once again.

Here a C107 broke for that of a P71 versus P36, and next loosening up a couple of other things, for only the same way of doing.

Making it a P56 for another factor, and I could be past any middle or average, for only smaller factors on the fliparound side.

Rather that I could make it 2*3 or 5*7 for still the P71 versus P56 for just multiplied, and next the true answer for still only the fliparound.

Some people could make it still 65537 here for still not any Genefer, but only a substitute for that of RSA here instead.

But here 2*3*7 is still 42, for also 168/4 (integer division) making for still the same, for not any certificate just in between.

Edit: Huh, so that of perhaps the better, for not any lookback for only a C136 instead, when perhaps a P71 for only known.

Here the idiot of sorts could be asking when we could be meeting again, for not any closed door it should be either.

To my best guess, for also knowledge, the factors of the Magical number should be the remaining factors for only left,
when still sieving for only the best we could perhaps make it.

Here the flipover for the abovementioned C136 could still end up a P54, when also a surprise for the same, for only given number.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001586983155

So, look back at RSA just here, for only the numbers it could be, when also excluding for the same, for perhaps the dealing of numbers for just the same.

Say you, say me, for not any C136 being factorable either, but only that it slips around for that of the other way, for still a P54 just here.

So you think it perhaps could be the better numbers just here, for still only the fliparound, for that of a remainder.

Next it bumps, for still only above or below, because you could be pushing it further for only answer just meant.

Checking with the posted link, for that of a copying and paste for only main here, and next still my eyes.

Edit: Trying to update with the FDB here, but grinding to a halt for that of painfully slow.

Next making a new one post here, for that of continuing, because here a couple of better factors in the meantime.

Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2020-10-29 at 23:11
storflyt32 is offline   Reply With Quote