View Single Post
Old 2021-06-04, 03:17   #5
sweety439's Avatar
"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36

5·13·47 Posts

Originally Posted by paulunderwood View Post
More attacks on our hard efforts! "Only 28709 digits" -- have you tried running Primo, even at 10k digits? it is O(log(n)^(4+eps)). It is not trivial to do such certifications. It is absurd to say that Wagstaff is "much more important" than a partition number. The latter has greater entropy and show off the effectiveness of ECPP. There are couple of aims here: big ECPP and proving classic top20 PRPs. We aim to do both. Please stop harping on about our efforts and start doing some Primo work.
I only have Windows10, and there is no Windows version for Primo.
sweety439 is offline   Reply With Quote