View Single Post
Old 2021-06-02, 07:07   #3
sweety439
 
sweety439's Avatar
 
"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36

2×1,531 Posts
Default I am curious why someone won't do what I want

I am curious that why none has reserved the Wagstaff number (2^95369+1)/3, it has only 28709 digits, much smaller than the partition number Partition(1289844341) (40000 digits), which is already reserved and proven to be prime (see http://www.ellipsa.eu/public/primo/top20.html), and Wagstaff numbers are much more important (and seems to be easier to be proven prime) than partition numbers.
sweety439 is online now   Reply With Quote