View Single Post
Old 2021-06-02, 07:07   #3
sweety439's Avatar
"99(4^34019)99 palind"
Nov 2016
(P^81993)SZ base 36

2×1,531 Posts
Default I am curious why someone won't do what I want

I am curious that why none has reserved the Wagstaff number (2^95369+1)/3, it has only 28709 digits, much smaller than the partition number Partition(1289844341) (40000 digits), which is already reserved and proven to be prime (see, and Wagstaff numbers are much more important (and seems to be easier to be proven prime) than partition numbers.
sweety439 is online now   Reply With Quote