View Single Post
Old 2020-02-11, 13:52   #7
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

22×5×373 Posts
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by retina View Post
I didn't say the test was the same. I said you plagiarised the text. You showed no respect to the original authors. Perhaps we should show you a similar amount of respect in return.
Thank you!

BTW, the change of base is irrelevant. [Hint: it is just a different sub-group generator; see just below]

One other thing. Now that we have a "new" test [It isn't], perhaps the author will explain to us how he derived this
test. He can start with an explanation of what computations are being performed in GF(p^2) where p is the number
being tested. Perhaps he can give an explanation in terms of the generators of the various (multiplicative) sub-groups.


If he can't then he should STFU and stop stealing and copying ideas (that he doesn't understand) from elsewhere.

Last fiddled with by R.D. Silverman on 2020-02-11 at 13:58
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote