View Single Post
Old 2012-03-30, 09:39   #10
ldesnogu's Avatar
Jan 2008

23·67 Posts

Originally Posted by Dubslow View Post
I think I see what you mean, create a new "library" with a function of the same name as above that returns 2.0?

Either way, you'd still have to recompile it, right? And if so, then there's probably a safer workaround anyways.
I took as hypothesis that the original program checks for 2.0 even though it only uses 1.3 capabilities (note that I don't know anything about CUDA, so this might make no sense ). In that case no recompilation of the original program is needed.
ldesnogu is offline   Reply With Quote