View Single Post
Old 2020-11-17, 15:20   #14
wagner85
 
Aug 2020

52 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fivemack View Post
Did you (or prime.txt) do anything non-obvious with assignment of CPU cores to workers? If the old system was running one worker on 012345 and the other on 6789ab, and that's stayed the same for the new system, then worker2 will be using non-local memory and worker1 will be
having some of its memory bandwidth stolen by worker2.

This is consistent with your measurements of worker2 being much slower than worker1 and both workers being slower than before.
It may have happened.
I have just replaced the old cpus with the new ones.
How do I confirm that hypothesis ?
I will paste here the prime.txt for both servers once I get home.
Would I solve this by starting a new p95 folder and move the files related to my current work to new folder?
wagner85 is offline   Reply With Quote