View Single Post
Old 2013-08-27, 01:45   #42
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

3·1,031 Posts
Default

Totally agree.

1. 4788 c173 is definitely ready for GNFS. I'm not sure the enthusiasm given the low interest level of these two "relatively" new sequences.

2. We have acres to go into 26e7 before considering GNFS. Hopefully, some factor searching ECMer may come across a nice find.

Seq 3408 may be the main focus for the immediate future with some ECM curves on 3366 here or there.

BTW, these GNFS projects will require the 15e siever. This is beyond a request to NFS@Home because they have so many in backlog to meet other obligations.
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote