View Single Post
Old 2019-04-20, 05:47   #2
devarajkandadai
 
devarajkandadai's Avatar
 
May 2004

4748 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by devarajkandadai View Post
1) We can say that proving RH is equivalent to proving that
zeta(s + it) is a non trivial non-zero when the real part (s) is other than 1/2, irrespective of the imaginary part(t)
(to be continued).
2) one implies many: I.e. if a zero exists on any line parallel to 1/2 then many ought to exist. If this can be proved we have practicality proved RH.
devarajkandadai is offline   Reply With Quote