View Single Post
Old 2020-07-13, 21:01   #190
diep
 
diep's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
The Netherlands

11×71 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lalera View Post
hi
for wagstaff numbers
i do like to reserve the range
16400000 to 16600000
Why not take 16.4M to 164M as then at least you got some sort of decent odds to find at least 1.

The odds of a PRP in Wagstaff between [n;2n] seems diverging - not converging - and if i may blindfolded guess it could be on average a gap of factor 3 between a group of PRP's and the next one.
diep is offline   Reply With Quote