View Single Post
Old 2020-01-06, 22:15   #3
VBCurtis's Avatar
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

13·367 Posts

Dropping 14% from the matrix size from just 50M more unique relations sounds pretty good! I wonder if 25M more unique relations would have meaningfully helped the matrix; 50M is for me kind of a hard line where I really want more relations to not face something bigger, but you're already stretching the tools, as you noted.

I'd like to do a GNFS-200 on 15e, just because it's a Big Round Number. Perhaps a hybrid of offline 16e (or CADO) up to Q=100M, combined with 15e queue from 100M up.
VBCurtis is offline