Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-11-04, 08:02
|
Replies: 105
Views: 6,870
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-11-04, 07:55
|
Replies: 105
Views: 6,870
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-11-04, 07:25
|
Replies: 105
Views: 6,870
Dear Malcolm,
Thanks for your clarification....
Dear Malcolm,
Thanks for your clarification. The expression ((6*M)+1) comprises all
primes and prime products, M being any natural number from - infinity
to + infinity. But these integers will...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-11-01, 11:59
|
Replies: 105
Views: 6,870
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-10-27, 11:12
|
Replies: 105
Views: 6,870
answer
answer:
6 times all natural numbers (M) from - infinity to + infinity +1
will be an integer of the form (6*M +1), which will never be divisible by
2 or 3. In other words ((6*M)+1) comprise...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-10-25, 11:32
|
Replies: 105
Views: 6,870
explanation
Dear Richard,
Thanks for your comments.
Let me start with your final suggestion. I don't mind to change terminology
from "possible primes" to "Munkner integers". These expressions cover in fact...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-10-24, 10:56
|
Replies: 105
Views: 6,870
Dear Malcolm,
You have kindly submitted three...
Dear Malcolm,
You have kindly submitted three replies with reference to my thread
"A (new) Prime Theorem".
Please recall my definition of "possible primes" [(6*M)+1], M being any
integer from -...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-10-23, 16:10
|
Replies: 105
Views: 6,870
unnecessary tears
You don't understand my subdivison of integers into three groups:
a) even integers
b) odd integers divisible by 3 (modules 0,III,VI, modulo 9)
c) odd...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-10-23, 11:06
|
Replies: 43
Views: 2,985
Once more
Read my text correctly, please.
I state that 6* any integer will never be a prime (e.g. 6*5)
and (6*5)+1 will be a prime
and (6*15)+1 will be a prime product.
Both 31 and 91 are "possible...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-10-23, 10:45
|
Replies: 105
Views: 6,870
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-10-23, 06:44
|
Replies: 43
Views: 2,985
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-10-23, 06:04
|
Replies: 105
Views: 6,870
Dear Malcolm,
The book was a gift.
Sorry that...
Dear Malcolm,
The book was a gift.
Sorry that you don't have the necessary time yo read the book.
Please, ask me for additional information, and you will get it.
In the near future I will publish...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-10-15, 09:59
|
Replies: 105
Views: 6,870
You are absolutely right. A minus sign was...
You are absolutely right. A minus sign was missing in "29", which was
a lapsus calami. Later in my text the number was correctly given as (-29).
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Y.s.
troels...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-10-14, 16:09
|
Replies: 105
Views: 6,870
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-10-14, 16:03
|
Replies: 105
Views: 6,870
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-10-07, 14:11
|
Replies: 105
Views: 6,870
ACKOWLEDGEMENT
dear Malcolm,
You are the alone one who has understood my message.
But you happen to have a copy of my original publication.
I realize that I am offending (nearly) all mathematicians,when I...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-10-04, 15:52
|
Replies: 105
Views: 6,870
a polite dialogue will be appreciated
All...
a polite dialogue will be appreciated
All integers from - infinity to + infinity can be subdivided into three groups.
A. Even integers which will be products of 2 and an other integer.
B. Odd...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-10-01, 09:08
|
Replies: 105
Views: 6,870
A (new) prime theorem.
"A Prime Number Theorem" was published in 1986
(ISBN 87 7245 129 7, Rhodos Publishers Copenhagen, DK).
"Possible primes" were defined as [(6*m)+1], m being an integer
from - infinity to +...
|
Forum: Puzzles
2006-09-01, 14:23
|
Replies: 24
Views: 2,697
1 (one) is not a prime, but a possible prime,...
1 (one) is not a prime, but a possible prime, which at same time is a square.
It is = (0*6 +1) * (0*6+1).
2 and 3 are not possible primes and should never be considered as primes.
If you want to...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-07-16, 13:57
|
Replies: 2
Views: 690
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-07-13, 12:26
|
Replies: 43
Views: 2,985
I know of course Euclid's "proof". But I went...
I know of course Euclid's "proof". But I went behind the statement and
studied it in more details. Please, look up the attachments which were not
in the first thread (unfortunately).
If you can...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-07-13, 12:20
|
Replies: 43
Views: 2,985
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-07-11, 09:36
|
Replies: 43
Views: 2,985
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-07-11, 09:00
|
Replies: 43
Views: 2,985
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2006-07-11, 08:51
|
Replies: 43
Views: 2,985
Euclid's proof
Unfortunally the three attachments were missing.
I will try to submit them in separate threads.
All the best,
troels
|