Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-10-12, 20:59
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
For comparison, here are the two previous...
For comparison, here are the two previous polynomials that were reported for the same stage1 hit:
# norm 6.990167e-17 alpha -10.811225 e 6.655e-17 rroots 4
skew: 23705501.95
c0: ...
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-09-04, 22:01
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-09-04, 17:57
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-08-30, 16:56
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
Note that there is a per-coefficient time...
Note that there is a per-coefficient time deadline (currently 3200 secs for rsa768). If the search for some coefficient is still going when the time limit hits, it will be stopped and the next...
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-08-25, 19:12
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-08-24, 19:22
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
My apologies. And thanks for continuing. The...
My apologies. And thanks for continuing. The updates will start slowing down.
BTW, are you still running on the same set of a6 coefficients each time? The randomization will ensure that a few runs...
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-08-24, 17:14
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-08-24, 06:58
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-08-20, 16:05
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
The most recent revision is 623.
When you...
The most recent revision is 623.
When you start running it, I suggest picking a coeff range that starts from at least 7 digits. 8 or 9 digits may be preferable. The internal parameters used for...
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-08-19, 18:16
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-08-19, 07:14
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-08-19, 06:56
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-08-18, 11:16
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
Thanks for the testing.
If you like, please...
Thanks for the testing.
If you like, please try the newest svn (620). Now, things are run in larger batches, which might boost throughput a little bit. CPU usage should be closer to 0%. Also the...
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-08-18, 02:24
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-08-18, 01:00
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-08-18, 00:22
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-08-16, 20:34
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-08-11, 18:54
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
A quick benchmark with RSA768 and A6 ~1e7...
A quick benchmark with RSA768 and A6 ~1e7 suggests that the new code is about 100 times as fast as the original CUDA version on my system. I suspect that the CUDA version might be a bit faster than...
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-08-10, 08:10
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
yes...
I have GPU code that, when running on...
yes...
I have GPU code that, when running on an (ancient) 8800 GTS, can find RSA768 polys at about the same speed as the CPU code does on one core of a (similarly ancient) C2D. No idea yet how it...
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-08-07, 07:23
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-04-28, 06:17
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-04-28, 00:45
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-04-25, 02:47
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
SVN revisions between 1.47 and 1.48 would have...
SVN revisions between 1.47 and 1.48 would have all said v1.48 in the logs, even though they weren't final. The final 1.48 was released on Jan 8th. Does that make sense? Sorry for the confusion.
(I...
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-04-25, 01:14
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
|
Forum: Operation Kibibit
2011-04-24, 20:18
|
Replies: 200
Views: 53,150
|