Forum: 3*2^n-1 Search
2007-03-02, 23:23
|
Replies: 53
Views: 25,881
Just to let you know that I tried making a...
Just to let you know that I tried making a 3*2^n-1 specific compilation of the sieve from the sr1sieve-1.0.11 source, but it worked out hardly any faster than the standard version.
|
Forum: 3*2^n-1 Search
2007-02-07, 02:31
|
Replies: 53
Views: 25,881
I won't be updating 321sieve for now, but if at...
I won't be updating 321sieve for now, but if at some point you decide that it is worthwhile continuing sieving for this project, then I will make a new 321sieve based on the latest sr1sieve code.
...
|
Forum: 3*2^n-1 Search
2007-01-15, 03:06
|
Replies: 53
Views: 25,881
|
Forum: 3*2^n-1 Search
2007-01-14, 00:47
|
Replies: 53
Views: 25,881
I don't have a 64-bit machine to test with, but...
I don't have a 64-bit machine to test with, but I'll see if I can find what is causing that fault. If you can compile with DEGUG=yes set in the Makefile it might give a clue, and even if not it will...
|
Forum: 3*2^n-1 Search
2007-01-11, 05:06
|
Replies: 53
Views: 25,881
321sieve
I have made a sieve 321sieve (http://www.geocities.com/g_w_reynolds/321sieve/) that will work for this project. It is based on sr5sieve used for the Sierpinski/Riesel base 5 project, but optimised to...
|