mersenneforum.org Search Results
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 Showing results 1 to 25 of 53 Search took 0.01 seconds. Search: Posts Made By: drmurat
 Forum: Miscellaneous Math 2020-09-15, 16:06 Replies: 12 Views: 528 Posted By drmurat Thanks Thanks
 Forum: Miscellaneous Math 2020-09-15, 15:41 Replies: 12 Views: 528 Posted By drmurat Thanks you but my english is not so well. And... Thanks you but my english is not so well. And This unswer Will change my life view. Can you explain step by step how can we devide This giant number to 107 easly
 Forum: Miscellaneous Math 2020-09-15, 15:09 Replies: 12 Views: 528 Posted By drmurat Thanks for your advice. I Will do but how did you... Thanks for your advice. I Will do but how did you devide such a big number to107. How did you check primabilty so easly I also give much bigger samples
 Forum: Miscellaneous Math 2020-09-15, 14:15 Replies: 12 Views: 528 Posted By drmurat This number isk value so we must find 6 x k and... This number isk value so we must find 6 x k and than we must look 6 x k+ 1 and 6 x k - 1to check primabilty but how did you calculated 107 easly
 Forum: Miscellaneous Math 2020-09-15, 12:39 Replies: 12 Views: 528 Posted By drmurat The giant number iş not twin prime ...
 Forum: Miscellaneous Math 2020-09-15, 09:54 Replies: 12 Views: 528 Posted By drmurat I also mention values of k in 6 x k +1 and 6 x k 1 I also mention values of k in 6 x k +1 and 6 x k 1
 Forum: Miscellaneous Math 2020-09-15, 09:49 Replies: 12 Views: 528 Posted By drmurat yes I guess that the number 6 x 10 ^... yes I guess that the number 6 x 10 ^ (900.000.000.000) + 18 x 10 ^ ( 450.000.000.000) + 1 also is not belong to twin prime number
 Forum: Miscellaneous Math 2020-09-15, 09:34 Replies: 12 Views: 528 Posted By drmurat giant number is not a prime I guess that 6 * 10 ^ (900.000.000.000) is not belog to twin prime number . any idea ?
 Forum: Aliquot Sequences 2020-07-15, 17:15 Replies: 2 Views: 854 Posted By drmurat yes right yes right
 Forum: Aliquot Sequences 2020-07-15, 09:38 Replies: 2 Views: 854 Posted By drmurat the aliquot sum of 6 x k number the aliquot sum of 6 x k number is always bigger than number . ( k > 1)
 Forum: Miscellaneous Math 2020-07-14, 11:37 Replies: 14 Views: 1,026 Posted By drmurat x okay . firstly I calculated the aliquot... x okay . firstly I calculated the aliquot sum of 2^n * a * b ( a , b prime ) . the calculation method is not based on divisors . then I get the difference of number and aliquot sum I get th result...
 Forum: Miscellaneous Math 2020-07-14, 09:45 Replies: 14 Views: 1,026 Posted By drmurat the condition is 2^n and two prime number with... the condition is 2^n and two prime number with the mantioned relation . for example 2 5 9 . 5 and 9 must be prime or 8 17 33 . 17 and 33 must he prime . I didnt say all numbers gives perfect number...
 Forum: Aliquot Sequences 2020-07-10, 11:34 Replies: 15 Views: 1,452 Posted By drmurat any idea . is this proof ? any idea . is this proof ?
 Forum: Aliquot Sequences 2020-07-09, 17:32 Replies: 15 Views: 1,452 Posted By drmurat is this proof ? or known rule is this proof ? or known rule
 Forum: Aliquot Sequences 2020-07-09, 05:02 Replies: 15 Views: 1,452 Posted By drmurat I wiill try to prove . if anyone show me a sample... I wiill try to prove . if anyone show me a sample . which is not correct . I will glad to see that sample
 Forum: Miscellaneous Math 2020-07-08, 19:34 Replies: 14 Views: 1,026 Posted By drmurat I asked it because if 2^(n) + 1 is prime and... I asked it because if 2^(n) + 1 is prime and 2^(n+1) + 1 can be prime . it means (2^n) * (2^ (2n) + 1) *(2^ (2n+1) + 1) gives perfect number but it is impossible . one of them is devided by 3
 Forum: Miscellaneous Math 2020-07-08, 18:59 Replies: 14 Views: 1,026 Posted By drmurat yes it is impossible . one of rhem is diveded by... yes it is impossible . one of rhem is diveded by 3 all the time
 Forum: Miscellaneous Math 2020-07-08, 16:29 Replies: 14 Views: 1,026 Posted By drmurat can you give sample can you give sample
 Forum: Aliquot Sequences 2020-07-08, 16:21 Replies: 15 Views: 1,452 Posted By drmurat how big number is not important it gives correct... how big number is not important it gives correct valie in this format onlyersenne numbers can provude perfect numbera . all is also known
 Forum: Miscellaneous Math 2020-07-08, 15:53 Replies: 14 Views: 1,026 Posted By drmurat yes but lets try n> 1 yes but lets try n> 1
 Forum: Miscellaneous Math 2020-07-08, 15:25 Replies: 14 Views: 1,026 Posted By drmurat lol and one more sample ? lol and one more sample ?
 Forum: Miscellaneous Math 2020-07-08, 14:46 Replies: 14 Views: 1,026 Posted By drmurat is it possible is it possible ( 2 ^ n ) +1 and ( 2 ) ^ ( n + 1 ) + 1 can be prime
 Forum: Aliquot Sequences 2020-07-08, 14:30 Replies: 15 Views: 1,452 Posted By drmurat my way is a bit faster if A = 28 = 4×7 = 2^2 ×... my way is a bit faster if A = 28 = 4×7 = 2^2 × 7 my formula for number A = 2 ^ n * m ( m is prime) B = A + 2 * ( 2^ n - 1 ) - ( m - 1 ) B = 28 + 2 * ( 3) - ( 7-1) B = 28 + 6 - 6 B= 28 A =...
 Forum: Aliquot Sequences 2020-07-08, 13:11 Replies: 15 Views: 1,452 Posted By drmurat thanks so much I can calculate B directly... thanks so much I can calculate B directly without calculating C . any study you know about this ?
 Forum: Aliquot Sequences 2020-07-08, 10:29 Replies: 15 Views: 1,452 Posted By drmurat thanks but thats are so complex formulas for me ... thanks but thats are so complex formulas for me I wonder that after factorization my number A=2^400.000 x 5 or A=3^100.000 x 11 is it easy to find B or C
 Showing results 1 to 25 of 53

All times are UTC. The time now is 07:36.

Fri Oct 30 07:36:38 UTC 2020 up 50 days, 4:47, 1 user, load averages: 1.51, 1.59, 1.66