mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Aliquot Sequences (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=90)
-   -   Aliquot sequences that start on the integer powers n^i (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=23612)

kar_bon 2018-11-22 16:13

28^17 terminates

garambois 2018-11-22 21:04

[QUOTE=LaurV;500699]How often are they updated from the DB?
(for the new addition of 28, the table needs to "pick up" another ~22 green cells, as almost all even powers in the table terminate, some were already terminated by the DB elves, some just needed a little push).
[/QUOTE]

OK, updated.
For the moment, I have put an "A" for the new aliquot sequences completed for base 28.
Tell me in front of which finished aliquot sequences I should write your name.

[QUOTE=LaurV;500699]
One observation: is it possible to transform javascript links in hard links? One reason, beside of the fact that few people here are scared of javascript (Hello Retina! :razz:), is that the js links are hiding the real link until it is clicked, and when clicked, it opens in another window. If I want to open 5 of them in the same time for comparisons or whatever stupid reason I may have, then I end up with 6 different browsers (including the initial one) floating around my monitors. There is also no way to right click it and tell what to do with the link (like copy it or open it in another place/tab/etc). This looks like a hacker site that deliberately hides the links, and functionally, it is a bit bothering when we want to open more (or all) sequences at once and have them in different tabs in the same browser (actually, impossible to do without heavily altering firefox behavior, because the js link is bypassing the ff's "Open links in tabs instead of new windows" settings).

The "best" workaround I found up to now is to just click the link, then combine the two browsers in one by dragging the tab from the new one to the old one where I have the other tabs. This is easy, but it has the inconvenient that it switches the view to the new tab (well, guess what! I want too much, haha).
[/QUOTE]

I'll see about that next weekend.
But I don't know the code to make these changes.
It was Karsten Bonath who kindly proposed to create this page, I would have been unable to do so !
I'm not even really sure I understand your request.... for the moment !

[QUOTE=LaurV;500699]
About the colors, yes, the "missing" one is orange, but functionally, there is no difference on your site between "orange" and "no color". They all are open sequences, or unknown, or however you want to call them. But I assume your affirmation was a joke related to the fact that you expect(ed) few of us (me) to reserve few of those sequences and work them higher than 120 digits. But don't worry, that time will come...[/QUOTE]

I am really very happy with all the help you are all providing !
And I know what a constraint it is to push the calculations for a series of aliquot sequences to 120 digits.
Everyone does everything they can and any contribution is welcome, however modest.
There is no difference between white cells and oranges, that is true.
I think that when a cell is orange, the calculations are already quite advanced and that should be enough.
Anyway, it would take far too long in computing time to push beyond 10^120 !
And it would already do a great service if someone added even a few iterations, even 60 or 80 digits to a single aliquot sequence !

kar_bon 2018-11-23 07:37

11^60 reaches 120 digits

kar_bon 2018-11-23 08:54

After adding ~3700 lines to 28^21 it merges at index 4035 with 818880:i7

kar_bon 2018-11-23 10:16

11^32 reached 123 digits

gd_barnes 2018-11-23 10:35

I tested all of n=7 up to size 102 and cofactor 97 (fully ECM'd). Here are the updates:

7^44: 762 U104 (101) +11 iterations
7^50: 498 U106 (103) +70
7^52: 787 U103 (101) +48
7^54: 444 U104 (98) +26
7^56: 2647 U105 (97) +80
7^60: 401 U103 (102) +54
7^62: 2124 U106 (97) +1001
7^64: 1564 U102 (98) +1386
7^66: 382 U103 (97) +25
7^68: 2669 U107 (97) +115
7^70: 1574 U105 (101) +6
7^72: 170 U104 (98) +80
7^74: 135 U102 (97) +21
7^76: 325 U102 (98) +25
7^78: 157 U103 (100) +65
7^80: 1709 U105 (103) +79
7^82: 401 U102 (98) +35
7^84: 2562 U105 (100) +24
7^86: 239 U105 (97) +4
7^90: 839 U102 (97) +785
7^92: 1468 U103 (102) +1411
7^94: 632 U102 (97) +78
7^96: 13777 U203 (174) +1221 (As previously reported, merged with 4788 at term=1267!)
7^98: 1357 U102 (99) +54
7^100: 1195 U105 (100) +4
7^102: 131 U102 (100) +92
7^104: 2348 U107 (99) +43
7^106: 427 U103 (97) +381
7^110: 544 U104 (97) +471
7^112: 102 U107 (102) +62
7^114: 51 U108 (102) +10
7^116: 838 U103 (98) +803
7^118: 951 U103 (97) +925
7^120: 44 U114 (102) +20

Many of these were already updated before I reported them.

I am now working on all of n=10 testing to the same limit. I'll be done in ~2-3 days.

No reservations.

richs 2018-11-24 00:23

Reserving 439^34

garambois 2018-11-25 16:18

[QUOTE=LaurV;500699]How often are they updated from the DB?

(for the new addition of 28, the table needs to "pick up" another ~22 green cells, as almost all even powers in the table terminate, some were already terminated by the DB elves, some just needed a little push).

One observation: is it possible to transform javascript links in hard links? One reason, beside of the fact that few people here are scared of javascript (Hello Retina! :razz:), is that the js links are hiding the real link until it is clicked, and when clicked, it opens in another window. If I want to open 5 of them in the same time for comparisons or whatever stupid reason I may have, then I end up with 6 different browsers (including the initial one) floating around my monitors. There is also no way to right click it and tell what to do with the link (like copy it or open it in another place/tab/etc). This looks like a hacker site that deliberately hides the links, and functionally, it is a bit bothering when we want to open more (or all) sequences at once and have them in different tabs in the same browser (actually, impossible to do without heavily altering firefox behavior, because the js link is bypassing the ff's "Open links in tabs instead of new windows" settings).

The "best" workaround I found up to now is to just click the link, then combine the two browsers in one by dragging the tab from the new one to the old one where I have the other tabs. This is easy, but it has the inconvenient that it switches the view to the new tab (well, guess what! I want too much, haha).

[/QUOTE]


OK, all is done !
Now, you can see the URL.

Many thanks to Karsten Bonath.
I wouldn't have been able to make the change myself !

LaurV, as I don't know exactly for which aliquot sequences you finished the calculations, I put your name for all those whose source I don't know, even if some of them were finished by the DB elves...

:smile:

The page is updated once or twice a week.
It depends on the number of people who send results.

Thank you very much too to richs, gd_barnes, Karsten Bonath for the latest calculations.

kar_bon 2018-11-25 17:08

Note to the new links on that page, there's is a standard behavior:

- only left clicking the link will open factordb in the same window
- CTRL+left clicking will open in a new tab
- SHIFT+left clicking will open in a new window in foreground
- CTRL+SHIFT+left clicking will open in a new window in background

gd_barnes 2018-11-26 07:10

I tested all of n=10 up to size 102 and cofactor 97 (fully ECM'd). Here are the updates:

10^49: 946 U109 (97) +3 iterations
10^53: 1114 U103 (103) +8
10^55: 960 U103 (98) +27
10^57: 739 U102 (100) +17
10^59: 1385 U104 (97) +2
10^65: 1794 U108 (103) +17
10^69: 477 U103 (101) +17
10^73: 2680 U115 (114) +23
10^75: 559 U102 (98) +445
10^83: 922 U105 (102) +63
10^85: 1526 U104 (99) +110
10^87: 301 U105 (101) +49
10^91: 1312 U102 (97) +231
10^93: 917 U102 (97) +190
10^95: 297 U102 (99) +253
10^97: 2744 U102 (99) +2657 (Dropped to 12 digits!)
10^99: 50 U105 (97) +9
10^101: 405 U104 (103) +124
10^103: 71 U113 (108) +12
10^105: 642 U111 (99) +578
10^107: 11 U107 (103) +2

Here is one tested by others or the elves:
10^51: 2128 U105 (104) +3

Many of these were already updated before I reported them.

I am now working on all of n=11 testing to the same limit. I'll be done in ~2-3 days.

No reservations.

gd_barnes 2018-11-26 07:18

[QUOTE=kar_bon;500939]Note to the new links on that page, there's is a standard behavior:

- only left clicking the link will open factordb in the same window
- CTRL+left clicking will open in a new tab
- SHIFT+left clicking will open in a new window in foreground
- CTRL+SHIFT+left clicking will open in a new window in background[/QUOTE]

These two are incorrect:

- CTRL+left
- CTRL+SHIFT+left

It should be:
- CTRL+left clicking will open in a new tab in background
- CTRL+SHIFT+left clicking will open in a new tab in foreground


All times are UTC. The time now is 20:49.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.