[QUOTE=swellman;561552]I have no issue enqueuing this job even though it’s a touch over the difficulty and Q range limits for e_small. Any objections?[/QUOTE]

Where ever you think is best for balancing the grid.

I don't think the Q range nor LP size should be the deal-killer for e-small; but since memory use is advertised to BOINCers and overshooting the claims of memory use on 14e was a topic of complaint from the users previously. We should be hesitant about putting lim=134/268 jobs onto e-small.

That said, with one of these BOINC-competition things firing up, feeding the grid is more important this week than strictly following rules, so I point this out just for future "normal" times. E-small is more likely to run out right now, so we feed it.

I'll test-sieve a couple more jobs around SNFS-265 today, since it looks like the BOINCer army has arrived.

[QUOTE=VBCurtis;561562]I don't think the Q range nor LP size should be the deal-killer for e-small; but since memory use is advertised to BOINCers and overshooting the claims of memory use on 14e was a topic of complaint from the users previously. We should be hesitant about putting lim=134/268 jobs onto e-small.

That said, with one of these BOINC-competition things firing up, feeding the grid is more important this week than strictly following rules, so I point this out just for future "normal" times. E-small is more likely to run out right now, so we feed it.

I'll test-sieve a couple more jobs around SFNS-265 today, since it looks like the BOINCer army has arrived.[/QUOTE]

And FWIW, I have several jobs with difficulties in the high 250s that are probably actually within bounds for 15e-small. I'll work on getting a few test-sieved.

[B]QUEUED AS C172_785232_11530[/B]

C172 from 785232:i11530 for 15_e small queue:

[CODE]n: 2017146075209695116896365398417236105967681538512158722562374886741873756695928091960832628298102885487202336164778114259060003668462472752614297229623400985805685015158967
# norm 9.651545e-17 alpha -7.661741 e 2.471e-13 rroots 3
skew: 34977867.85
c0: 4447182967122057907765606348536577374031232
c1: 552797606118231906377542190590976096
c2: -34420768132857712903595321496
c3: -1016128504754010736787
c4: 48736323796768
c5: 194220
Y0: -1596940251429871087366953519990759
Y1: 907168370488505929
rlim: 134000000
alim: 134000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.6
alambda: 2.6
type: gnfs
lss: 0
[/CODE]
Suggesting sieve range is 40M-140M, I'll take the LA.
P.S. This task is slightly big for 14e queue within new guidelines, but you decide because 14e is almost empty.

We like 14e empty, and C172 is definitely within e-small guidelines. Good choice.

[QUOTE=VBCurtis;561562]We should be hesitant about putting lim=134/268 jobs onto e-small.[/QUOTE]

That was my fault for suggesting e_small. I seem to remember the 200 average lim but that is for 15e, not e_small.

I won't have anymore for e_small and 15e is currently building a long line.

During BOINC-challenge time, e-small was the right choice there for the job; with the benefit of hindsight we might just choose 134/200 or 134/180 for such a job, giving up a bit of speed to keep e-small fed without going too far over memory guidelines.

Your job surely did less damage than my bad poly on 5_791m1!!
Here's a corrected job for that number, with the full composite on the "n:" line:
[code]n: 111812867780754346560415289999565367225454303594734581562227132753730403501180897472097054990558568023911409057075955845067437060818207472286533090719208303228335541944193280571602322588666038416993870470159838517777152295693
type: snfs
skew: 0.87
deg: 6
c6: 5
c0: -2
Y1: -1
Y0: 5444517870735015415413993718908291383296
rlim: 67000000
alim: 50000000
lpbr: 32
lpba: 31
mfbr: 59
mfba: 58
rlambda: 2.7
alambda: 2.7[/code]
As noted previously, please sieve Q=10-72M on the -a side. A particularly lousy time to make such a mistake... :-/
EDIT: I'll PM Greg to kill the first try at this job.

I requeued it.

[B]QUEUED AS f91_127m1[/B]

(91^127-1)/8885379019009572114580296807875592974052066631170 from the Brent tables:
[code]
# Built Fri Oct 30 17:09:16 2020
# Estimated SNFS difficulty 249, GNFS equivalent 180, GNFS difficulty 200, degree 6
n: 70726288261859730096617803617430582262211312855340530291518042364729425580221365347709790195080930080009121691682197490771547106020923401882286489424688568288976730740133730938827386478255699769759209
type: snfs
c6: 91
c0: -1
# Y0 = 91^21
Y0: 137996870875659993023030601717979081222891
# Y1 = 1^0
Y1: 1
# msieve rating: skew 0.47, size 3.482e-12, alpha 0.164, combined = 2.903e-13 rroots = 2
skew: 0.47
rlim: 120000000
alim: 120000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.6
alambda: 2.6
lss: 0
[/code]

Sieve on 15e_small from 40M to 120M on the algebraic side.

Test sieving 10k ranges:
[code]
Q yield
40M 36520
80M 26151
120M 27823
160M 24026
200M 21852
[/code]

I'll do the LA.

Chris

[B]QUEUED AS f20_193p1[/B]

(20^193+1)/21 from the Brent tables:
[code]
# Built Sat Nov 7 16:58:32 2020
# Estimated SNFS difficulty 252, GNFS equivalent 181, GNFS difficulty 250, degree 6
n: 5978192128939695965557894688769206110573671851870509059900952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952380952381
type: snfs
c6: 20
c0: 1
# Y0 = 20^32
Y0: 429496729600000000000000000000000000000000
# Y1 = 1^0
Y1: 1
# msieve rating: skew 0.61, size 2.889e-12, alpha 0.209, combined = 2.534e-13 rroots = 0
skew: 0.607
rlim: 120000000
alim: 120000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.6
alambda: 2.6
[/code]

Sieve on 15e_small from 40M to 120M on the rational side.

Test sieving 10k ranges:
[code]
Q yield
40M 32637
80M 26000
120M 25192
160M 22391
200M 20142
[/code]
I also test sieved on the algebraic side. That's slower but there's not much in it.

I'll do the LA.

Chris

[B]QUEUED AS 7489_67m1[/B]

C254 from the OPN t550 file.
[CODE]n: 19154840215330208503787115744593094531540002908539926854298646600649592315484715365499344342915572111612181784107602272399610890987759942058078070777366850467164293154732836191675565637168096234709535909916854863497821052789709584606400148747284118769999
# 7489^67-1, difficulty: 259.59, skewness: 0.23, alpha: 0.00
# cost: 1.71251e+19, est. time: 8154.82 GHz days (not accurate yet!)
skew: 0.226
c6: 7489
c0: -1
Y1: -1
Y0: 4155871746805483237658018945361617561661889
type: snfs
rlim: 134000000
alim: 134000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.7
alambda: 2.7[/CODE]
Trial sieving 5K blocks.
[CODE] Q Yield
20M 10209
60M 8742
100M 8201
170M 6553[/CODE]