mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Aliquot Sequences (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=90)
-   -   Subproject #1: 210k-250k sequences to 100 digits (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=12132)

Batalov 2009-07-09 18:15

228042 sounds like fun.

10metreh 2009-07-09 18:27

[quote=henryzz;180364]agreed although i will probably keep an eye on the sequences near 100 digits

also something that need clearing up:
when i add a reservation i check its status in the database i have often found in this thread that there is only 50 iterations there or maybe the sequence starter has been run in the database
what should i do?
there seems little point in adding status when it doesn't even go to 10 digits
when should i start adding status for a sequence?
please bear in mind that it takes time to add the status for a sequence and 10metreh and i don't want to spend all day adding useless statuses when you reserve several sequences
i would feel inclined to say not to bother before 80 digits since it doesnt take me long to get up to there

50 digits is what i have been doing so far[/quote]

I would only update statuses if they have reached 70 digits, but I wouldn't update as soon as somebody reserves a sequence. IMO it takes up too much time.

henryzz 2009-07-09 18:28

[quote=bsquared;180344]Sheesz, this seems like the place to be!

I'll try 227220.[/quote]
not for a mod:smile:
for the opposite reason
its more work for us:smile:

10metreh 2009-07-09 18:32

Henryzz, a couple of notes on the colours: 2 * 3^2 is red not blue: it is a variant of 2 * 3. 2^2 * 3 * 5 is blue not red.

henryzz 2009-07-09 18:33

[quote=10metreh;180366]I would only update statuses if they have reached 70 digits, but I wouldn't update as soon as somebody reserves a sequence. IMO it takes up too much time.[/quote]
good idea
should we only do it at the major updates?
i am now realizing that doing statusing takes up quite a bit of time

10metreh 2009-07-09 18:40

[quote=henryzz;180371]good idea
should we only do it at the major updates?
i am now realizing that doing statusing takes up quite a bit of time[/quote]

Fine, just at the weekend if you like it that way.

bsquared 2009-07-09 18:41

[quote=henryzz;180371]good idea
should we only do it at the major updates?
i am now realizing that doing statusing takes up quite a bit of time[/quote]

It would be super if reservations could be handled thusly:
[URL]http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~twomack/homcun.pl[/URL]

I imagine that would help your workload a bit.

As for statuses (statusi? stati? whatever), in theory there is a query for anything with a database. A stored procedure which crawled a list of the currently reserved sequences could be run once a day, returning you a block of text which you could paste into the forum, and this whole business could be automated. But where's the fun in that, once the scripts are written?

- ben.

Batalov 2009-07-09 18:59

Will play with 224560, too.

Greebley 2009-07-09 21:23

I will start working on the 240xxx which is:
240030, 240096, 240120, 240378, 240432, 2240480, 240792, 240810

unconnected 2009-07-09 21:32

234768 i=728 size 106 C104
234210 i=902 size 106 C103

Both seqs uploaded to DB, but for 234768 something strange happens at i=602 and rest is not loaded yet. How to fix this?

Taking 227010 and 227200 next.

KriZp 2009-07-09 21:45

I'll take 223398


All times are UTC. The time now is 09:08.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.