So let me get you right. Are you saying you want me to explain why your so called weird example doesn't follow Beam's conjecture?

So let me get you right. Are you saying you want me to explain why your so called weird example doesn't follow Beal's conjecture?

The explanation to your so called weird example is simply that it cannot be factorised I.e. it cannot be written with brackets that have integer values.

[QUOTE=Awojobi;528901]The explanation to your so called weird example is simply that it cannot be factorised I.e. it cannot be written with brackets that have integer values.[/QUOTE]

Let x=y=5 and z=3. If that is the case, then your proof really boils down to nothing since 5/3 is not integer.

Looks like the thread could be locked to protect our sanity.

[QUOTE=mathwiz;528895]it's time to close this thread and move on to other things....[/QUOTE]
Agreed

[QUOTE=2M215856352p1;528905]Looks like the thread could be locked to protect our sanity.[/QUOTE]I was in the process of doing that when your post came in.

[COLOR="Red"][B][SIZE="3"]Thread locked[/SIZE][/B][/COLOR]
:bangheadonwall:

Randall explains it all...
 

A quick bit of staircase wit - it explains this whole thread in one picture:
[url]https://xkcd.com/2217/[/url]

[SPOILER]these days I watch xkcd in large batches ... and find something that could have been useful somethime ago[/SPOILER]