|
Team drive #16; k=350-400 n=2M-3M; Individual reservations k=310-350
This is team drive #16. k=350-400 for n=2M-3M is loaded into PRPnet port 1468.
Individual-k reservations are available for k=310-350 n>3M. For PRPnet processing, see [URL="http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=12224"]this thread[/URL] for information on our currently operating PRPnet servers. The info specific to this server that needs to be entered into your prpclient.ini file is: server=G1468:100:1:noprimeleftbehind.net:1468 For individual-k reservations, well sieved file(s) are available from PrimeGrid. If you need one and don't know where to get it from there, let us know with your reservation and we will send it to you. Just state what k and n-range you would like. It is preferred if you reserve the lowest n-ranges available for a specific k. Please plan to complete any reservations within ~6 months. A status update ~once/month stating where you're at would also be helpful. Please post reservations, statuses, completions, and results in this thread (or Email results to me). Primes can be posted in the top-5000 primes thread as usual. Let's find some BIG primes! :smile: reservations and search ranges: [code] k n-range reserved by status # primes 301 1M-2M unconnected complete 3 301 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) complete 0 303 1M-2M unconnected complete 0 303 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) complete 4 305 1M-2M unconnected complete 0 305 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) complete 1 307 1M-1.1M firejuggler complete 0 307 1.1M-2M Lennart complete 0 307 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) complete 1 309 1M-1.3M gamer007 complete 0 309 1.3M-2M Lennart complete 1 309 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) complete 0 311 1M-1.6M Cruelty complete 1 311 1.6M-2M unconnected complete 0 311 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) complete 1 313 1M-1.2M gamer007 complete 1 313 1.2M-1.3M gd_barnes complete 0 313 1.3M-2M Lennart complete 2 313 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) complete 1 315 1M-2M LLRnet (G3500) complete 5 315 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) complete 2 317 1M-1.2M gamer007 complete 1 317 1.2M-1.3M gd_barnes complete 0 317 1.3M-3M PRPnet (G1468) complete 1 319 1M-1.3M gamer007 complete 0 319 1.3M-2M MyDogBuster complete 3 319 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) complete 2 321 1M-2M LLRnet (G3500) complete 2 321 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) complete 3 323 1M-1.1M MrOzzy complete 0 323 1.1M-2M Lennart complete 0 323 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) complete 0 325 1M-1.1M nuggetprime PRPnet complete 0 325 1.1M-1.3M gd_barnes complete 0 325 1.3M-2M MyDogBuster complete 0 325 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) complete 4 327 1M-2M LLRnet (G3500) complete 1 327 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) complete 1 329 1M-1.3M gd_barnes complete 0 329 1.3M-3M PRPnet (G1468) complete 0 331 1M-1.3M gd_barnes complete 0 331 1.3M-2M kar_bon complete 0 331 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) complete 0 333 1M-2M LLRnet (G3500) complete 4 333 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) complete 3 333 3M-4M Chigoma333 complete 0 333 4M-5M Chigoma333 in progress 1 335 1M-1.3M gd_barnes complete 0 335 1.3M-1.366M MyDogBuster complete 0 335 1.366M-3M PRPnet (G1468) complete 5 337 1M-8.46M Cruelty complete 0 339 1M-2M LLRnet (G3500) complete 3 339 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) complete 1 341 1M-1.3M kar_bon complete 1 341 1.3M-3M PRPnet (G1468) complete 1 343 1M-2M Lennart complete 1 343 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) complete 0 345 1M-2M LLRnet (G3500) complete 3 345 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) complete 1 347 1M-1.61M LLRnet (G3500) complete 1 347 1.61M-3M PRPnet (G1468) complete 2 349 1M-1.5M Mini-Geek complete 2 349 1.5M-2M kar_bon complete 0 349 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) complete 0 351 1M-1.61M LLRnet (G3500) complete 0 351 1.61M-2M PRPnet (G1468) complete 1 351 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 1 353 1M-1.5M Mini-Geek complete 1 353 1.5M-2M MyDogBuster complete 0 353 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 355 1M-1.61M LLRnet (G3500) complete 1 355 1.61M-2M PRPnet (G1468) complete 1 355 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 357 1M-1.02M Batalov complete 1 357 1.02M-1.61M LLRnet (G3500) complete 2 357 1.61M-2M PRPnet (G1468) complete 3 357 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 2 359 1M-1.61M LLRnet (G3500) complete 0 359 1.61M-2M PRPnet (G1468) complete 0 359 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 361 1M-1.61M LLRnet (G3500) complete 3 361 1.61M-2M PRPnet (G1468) complete 0 361 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 363 1M-1.3M MyDogBuster complete 0 363 1.3M-2M PRPnet (G1468) complete 2 363 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 1 365 1M-1.61M LLRnet (G3500) complete 0 365 1.61M-2M PRPnet (G1468) complete 0 365 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 367 1M-1.61M LLRnet (G3500) complete 1 367 1.61M-2M PRPnet (G1468) complete 0 367 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 369 1M-1.61M LLRnet (G3500) complete 0 369 1.61M-2M PRPnet (G1468) complete 1 369 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 2 371 1M-1.61M LLRnet (G3500) complete 3 371 1.61M-2M PRPnet (G1468) complete 1 371 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 373 1M-2M MyDogBuster complete 1 373 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 1 375 1M-1.02M Batalov complete 0 375 1.02M-1.61M LLRnet (G3500) complete 4 375 1.61M-2M PRPnet (G1468) complete 0 375 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 377 1M-1.61M LLRnet (G3500) complete 1 377 1.61M-2M PRPnet (G1468) complete 0 377 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 3 379 1M-1.61M LLRnet (G3500) complete 1 379 1.61M-2M PRPnet (G1468) complete 2 379 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 381 1M-1.61M LLRnet (G3500) complete 1 381 1.61M-2M PRPnet (G1468) complete 2 381 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 383 1M-1.61M LLRnet (G3500) complete 1 383 1.61M-2M PRPnet (G1468) complete 2 383 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 385 1M-1.61M LLRnet (G3500) complete 1 385 1.61M-2M PRPnet (G1468) complete 0 385 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 1 387 1M-1.61M LLRnet (G3500) complete 0 387 1.61M-2M PRPnet (G1468) complete 3 387 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 389 1M-2M MyDogBuster complete 0 389 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 391 1M-1.3M MyDogBuster complete 1 391 1.3M-2M PRPnet (G1468) complete 4 391 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 393 1M-1.3M MyDogBuster complete 2 393 1.3M-2M PRPnet (G1468) complete 1 393 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 395 1M-2M MyDogBuster complete 2 395 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 1 397 1M-2M MyDogBuster complete 0 397 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 399 1M-1.3M MyDogBuster complete 1 399 1.3M-2M PRPnet (G1468) complete 4 399 2M-3M PRPNet (G1468) in progress 3 [/code]primes: [code] prime found by 140 total 333*2^4846958-1 Chigoma333 303*2^2949403-1 gd_barnes 321*2^2946654-1 gd_barnes 325*2^2890955-1 kruoli 303*2^2887603-1 Trilo 327*2^2881349-1 kruoli 313*2^2817751-1 Zachariassen 315*2^2791414-1 ototero 333*2^2785626-1 Zachariassen 335*2^2708958-1 ototero 377*2^2607856-1 mdettweiler 333*2^2591874-1 MiHost 357*2^2568110-1 mdettweiler 303*2^2562423-1 MiHost 369*2^2551955-1 mdettweiler 311*2^2544778-1 MiHost 319*2^2498685-1 MiHost 321*2^2496594-1 ototero 325*2^2473267-1 MiHost 373*2^2457859-1 mdettweiler 369*2^2436949-1 mdettweiler 303*2^2417452-1 ototero 333*2^2412735-1 MiHost 321*2^2378535-1 MiHost 305*2^2358854-1 MiHost 335*2^2338972-1 ototero 339*2^2336421-1 odicin 351*2^2331311-1 mdettweiler 345*2^2313720-1 MiHost 377*2^2262094-1 mdettweiler 347*2^2245598-1 odicin 325*2^2223243-1 ototero 385*2^2189441-1 ototero 315*2^2179612-1 ototero 399*2^2160379-1 kruoli 395*2^2152816-1 MischaR 307*2^2137553-1 ototero 319*2^2130729-1 composite 357*2^2109585-1 Chigoma333 399*2^2096857-1 Chigoma333 363*2^2088182-1 kruoli 399*2^2080579-1 Chigoma333 377*2^2050148-1 ototero 325*2^2024035-1 composite 317*2^1991592-1 Lennart 381*2^1974841-1 Lennart 391*2^1949159-1 odicin 351*2^1947281-1 Lennart 357*2^1934704-1 Lennart 335*2^1917610-1 Lennart 379*2^1909097-1 Lennart 391*2^1886863-1 Lennart 357*2^1871600-1 odicin 315*2^1869119-1 ototero 347*2^1861974-1 odicin 333*2^1853115-1 kar_bon 399*2^1839019-1 Lennart 379*2^1837291-1 Lennart 301*2^1801207-1 unconnected 319*2^1797261-1 MyDogBuster 383*2^1794636-1 Lennart 387*2^1793857-1 odicin 391*2^1780155-1 Lennart 399*2^1764851-1 Lennart 335*2^1762548-1 Lennart 357*2^1756764-1 odicin 355*2^1752713-1 odicin 345*2^1742652-1 kar_bon 315*2^1741334-1 kar_bon 319*2^1740047-1 MyDogBuster 387*2^1732185-1 Lennart 371*2^1717250-1 Mini-Geek 383*2^1716780-1 odicin 387*2^1709440-1 Mini-Geek 313*2^1703119-1 Lennart 395*2^1690690-1 MyDogBuster 399*2^1659001-1 MyDogBuster 309*2^1647947-1 Bibi 381*2^1646029-1 Lennart 315*2^1639432-1 Flatlander 369*2^1635299-1 Lennart 395*2^1611672-1 MyDogBuster 335*2^1597932-1 Mini-Geek 391*2^1596805-1 Kracker 393*2^1583890-1 Mini-Geek 311*2^1581686-1 Cruelty 373*2^1575751-1 MyDogBuster 363*2^1547344-1 kracker 315*2^1539539-1 Flatlander 333*2^1537644-1 Flatlander 347*2^1529964-1 ototero 375*2^1518534-1 ototero 301*2^1514873-1 unconnected 363*2^1513706-1 MyDogBuster 341*2^1484130-1 MyDogBuster 377*2^1483586-1 MyDogBuster 333*2^1474766-1 Flatlander 327*2^1473201-1 Flatlander 357*2^1473125-1 MyDogBuster 313*2^1456431-1 Lennart 399*2^1418376-1 MyDogBuster 371*2^1417702-1 MyDogBuster 339*2^1410789-1 kar_bon 321*2^1371846-1 kar_bon 321*2^1363671-1 kar_bon 367*2^1352793-1 kar_bon 361*2^1346489-1 MyDogBuster 319*2^1322059-1 MyDogBuster 375*2^1319127-1 kar_bon 379*2^1302991-1 MyDogBuster 357*2^1301704-1 MyDogBuster 393*2^1297402-1 MyDogBuster 399*2^1293056-1 MyDogBuster 349*2^1278551-1 Mini-Geek 375*2^1275345-1 MyDogBuster 391*2^1247959-1 MyDogBuster 349*2^1228715-1 Mini-Geek 333*2^1209174-1 kar_bon 371*2^1180806-1 MyDogBuster 345*2^1175842-1 kar_bon 339*2^1161347-1 kar_bon 301*2^1157561-1 unconnected 341*2^1129218-1 kar_bon 385*2^1126083-1 MyDogBuster 355*2^1125573-1 kar_bon 315*2^1116547-1 kar_bon 353*2^1114356-1 Mini-Geek 313*2^1137387-1 gamer007 371*2^1116274-1 ototero 339*2^1110323-1 kar_bon 393*2^1095688-1 MyDogBuster 383*2^1091332-1 ototero 381*2^1070022-1 MyDogBuster 375*2^1066662-1 kar_bon 361*2^1043099-1 MyDogBuster 361*2^1033973-1 MyDogBuster 317*2^1032378-1 gamer007 343*2^1020791-1 Lennart 357*2^1019004-1 Batalov 345*2^1000251-1 kar_bon [/code]Gary |
Reserving k = 395, 397 and 399 to whatever is available. What is the cutoff at this level of sieve anyway?
Gary, I need a copy of the sieve file so I can disperse ranges. |
I would like to reserve 303 and 311 (from 1.6M). Please send me the files.
|
[quote=MyDogBuster;209077]Reserving k = 395, 397 and 399 to whatever is available. What is the cutoff at this level of sieve anyway?
Gary, I need a copy of the sieve file so I can disperse ranges.[/quote] Yeah, I was going to send the file to you and Max here shortly. There is no cutoff. Search to whatever you want. We'll do some more sieving but the optimum depth for the entire range is not much higher than what it is already sieved to; perhaps P=175T. I wasn't going to hold the drive up any longer because it's already a far deeper sieve than anyone would search to if they were just doing a few k's on their own and the drive is likely to last 3-5 years anyway. Unconnected and Ian, n=1M-2M is a tremendous amount of work. Are you sure you want to reserve the entire range on your reserved k's? It will likely take at least 10 times longer to search n=1M-2M than n=600K-1M. Gary |
I'll reserve those 3 k's (395, 397 & 399) to n=1.3M for now.
|
Dmitry,
I Emailed you the 2 sieve files up to n=2M. Let me know if you want a smaller reservation. Gary |
Thanks, Gary!
I'll start testing and will see how it's going. |
I was going to post this earlier when this thread was first started but I forgot: as before with the n=600K-1M individual-k drive, if anyone would like to coordinate their resources by means of an automated server like we have for our team drives, I'll be glad to host one for them. I've found that a server comes in quite handy when dealing with multiple cores/machines, especially if some of them are not easily accessible. I can do both LLRnet and PRPnet servers (for PRPnet, I'm currently using v2.4.6 for all servers, but since 3.2.3 sounds like it will finally be able to work stably on Linux machines such as our server, I'd be willing to use that if requested); results would be posted to a downloadable URL like with the NPLB/CRUS public servers, and I'd process the raw results into the standard sorted format that Gary needs them in.
Note that this isn't limited just to reservations from this individual-k drive; I'm willing to host pretty much anything that LLRnet or PRPnet will support, since these servers aren't that hard to run once you've got the infrastructure already set up. :smile: One possible case this may be useful for is if, say, you have all your clients configured for PRPnet and still want to use it even though we're moving away from it on NPLB public servers now; one person in particular emailed me regarding such a conundrum and I'm thinking of him here. :smile: |
Status report
k=337 tested till n=2.39M - I'm still working on it.
|
I'll take k=349 and k=353 from 1M to 1.5M. (yep, the same ones I searched from 600K-850K...maybe they're due for primes now :grin:)
Edit: Files sent |
[quote=Mini-Geek;210843]I'll take k=349 and k=353 from 1M to 1.5M.
Edit: Files sent[/quote] Files received and work has begun. I don't really want to calculate an ETA, (might give me second thoughts about this :razz:) but for the most part it will have the full attention of my quad, and I'll report on it periodically. By a remarkable coincidence, there are exactly as many candidates for each k in the range I reserved! Each has 14561 candidates in n=1M-1.5M. I originally (for n=600K+) picked them because they had similar weights, but this is still a very odd coincidence. (over 1M-2M, 353 has 120 more candidates than 349, which is actually opposite from what you'd expect from their Nash weights: 349's 1463 vs 353's 1416) |
I've updated the 'Individual k'-page [url=www.rieselprime.de/NPLB/Efforts/Individual-k.htm]here[/url].
|
so , can I get k =307 from 1M to 1.25M?
|
ok, after a bit of testing, i'm going to reduce the range... 1M to 1.1M
Edited MyDog: I will send the file after I receive an email address via PM Edit: File sent |
Ian, thanks for sending the file to him.
Firejuggler, welcome to NPLB! I've been on a business trip so sorry to have not responded sooner. If you have any questions, let us know. One of the 4 admins is bound to respond fairly quickly. :-) |
no problem.
To split a file, you just have to divide roughly the line by 2 and paste the first line, right? ( and set aa different cpu for each LLR), right? ie : i have a file starting with 140000000000000:M:1:2:258 307 1000037 307 1000201 and the other with 140000000000000:M:1:2:258 307 1048321 307 1048333 |
Hi firejuggler,
yep, that's correct. The header-line is needed in every candidates file at the top to say LLR what work to do. If you got more than one core, you can also try to work with a LLRnet-server-client. For a download and more information see [url=http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=13165]here[/url]. |
hi.
crunching started... I do not manage to use the server-client one... (or more exactly , configure it) so I use 2 LLR , one on each core |
Status report
k=337 tested till n=2.45M - I'm still working on it.
|
349 and 353 are at n=1.11M. No primes.
|
Hi all,
What does everyone think about another 6k LLRnet mini drive here? I'm thinking the same 6 k's as before...all divisible by 3...those being k=315, 321, 327, 333, 339, & 345. Initially, we would start with the range of n=1M-1.3M and then decide what we want to do after that. Max, assuming that we decide to do this, I'll leave it up to you what port we want to use. I seem to remember you mentioning port 2500 in an Email but wasn't sure if that was set in stone. If the interest is there, we could also set up a PRPnet server for part of the range. If anyone has any different ideas about it, let us know. The drive will be informal like before with no separate thread. Gary |
[QUOTE=gd_barnes;215048]What does everyone thing about another 6k LLRnet mini drive here? I'm thinking the same 6 k's as before...all divisible by 3...those being k=315, 321, 327, 333, 339, & 345.[/QUOTE]
Good idea and I was waiting for such effort. It's easier to maintain and to process. And I want to get back my 13-out-of-20-biggest-LLRnet-NPLB-primes-place! :grin: |
[quote=gd_barnes;215048]Max, assuming that we decide to do this, I'll leave it up to you what port we want to use. I seem to remember you mentioning port 2500 in an Email but wasn't sure if that was set in stone. If the interest is there, we could also set up a PRPnet server for part of the range.[/quote]
The port I previously mentioned to Dave for this was 3500--I've reserved the 2x00 space for doublecheck servers in the future (to avoid confusion with standard servers). I already detailed my numbering convention to Gary by email before, but for everyone else's sake, here it is: First-pass NPLB servers: ports x000 and x500 (the latter beginning at 3500) Second-pass NPLB servers: ports 2x00 CRUS servers: ports 1x00 (Note that ports <1024 are a pain to use under Linux, so those are off-limits for servers.) Right now the only remaining unused x000 port is 2000, so I emailed Dave a while back asking him to open up x500 so we'd have more room there. Even though port 2000 is available, to avoid confusion with future and past doublecheck servers in the 2x00 range, I'd rather avoid using 2000 for firstpass servers unless we completely run out of other options; therefore the new server will be on port 3500. Any more servers in the future will go on 4500, 5500, etc. Meanwhile, though, definitely agreed on doing another mini-drive. (Duh, Gary and I already discussed this privately so of course I'm agreed on it. :rolleyes:) I might chip in at some point once it's running--as I recall I netted a couple of big juicy primes off the last such mini-drive and I wouldn't mind repeating that, this time for some megabits. :smile: |
395, 397 and 399 at n=1.1M, continuing
|
To make it official: Reserving k=315/321/327/333/339/345 for n=1M-1.3M for port 3500 for another 6k mini drive.
Max, I have port 3500 set up, loaded up and ready to go for the next 6k drive but have not yet started it. My router congif has also been tweaked for the new server. For now, I've only loaded n=1M-1.1M into the server. I can't remember what you did behind-the-scenes for the previous 6k drives. Should it be added to the regular "LLRnet servers for NPLB" web page? If so, of course we'll need to add it to the 1st post of that thread there. I wanted to hold off starting it until you confirm everything that needs to be done but most importantly, can you please make sure that AMDave has all of the behind-the-scenes stuff set up for the stats DB and that he has had plenty of time to check things in that regard? After doing what you need to, feel free to let 'er rip. You should just be able to hit enter on the L3500 command prompt server tab. Thanks! :smile: Gary |
[quote=gd_barnes;215294]To make it official: Reserving k=315/321/327/333/339/345 for n=1M-1.3M for port 3500 for another 6k mini drive.
Max, I have port 3500 set up, loaded up and ready to go for the next 6k drive but have not yet started it. My router congif has also been tweaked for the new server. For now, I've only loaded n=1M-1.1M into the server. I can't remember what you did behind-the-scenes for the previous 6k drives. Should it be added to the regular "LLRnet servers for NPLB" web page? If so, of course we'll need to add it to the 1st post of that thread there. I wanted to hold off starting it until you confirm everything that needs to be done but most importantly, can you please make sure that AMDave has all of the behind-the-scenes stuff set up for the stats DB and that he has had plenty of time to check things in that regard? After doing what you need to, feel free to let 'er rip. You should just be able to hit enter on the L3500 command prompt server tab. Thanks! :smile: Gary[/quote] Dave should be all set on his end, so the only further things to do are: -Add the server to the script that copies off its results files daily -Add the server to my script that generates the [URL]http://www.noprimeleftbehind.net/llrnet/[/URL] page -Add the server to the "LLRnet servers for NPLB" thread I'll do both shortly. Edit: all done! |
almost done with assignement (307 1M-1.1M, no prime so far)
i'll take 363, for the same range (hopefully, it will go faster) |
To make it official:
The 6k mini drive for k=315/321/327/333/339/345 for n=1M-1.3M has now started. The LLRnet server info. is: server = "www.noprimeleftbehind.net" port = 3500 |
[quote=firejuggler;215348]almost done with assignement (307 1M-1.1M, no prime so far)
i'll take 363, for the same range (hopefully, it will go faster)[/quote] Ian, Can you Email Firejuggler k=363 for n=1M-1.1M? I think you have his Email address. If you can copy me in on that, I'll be able to Email them to him in the future. Firejuggler, k=363 should take 4-5 times longer to test than k=307. k=363 has 6173 pairs to test for n=1M-1.1M while k=307 only has 1343 pairs. On the bright side, you'll have a lot better chance of a prime. :-) If you look at the 1st post, you'll see a list of "weights" for k's that have not been started yet. (I've now removed your k=363.) This gives a relative idea of how many pairs each k will have. The higher it is, the more pairs it will have. The average is about 1600. k=363 has a weight of >3100; one of the highest of all k=300-400. Gary Edit: File sent |
ok, so it is the opposite of what I though... I though that the higher the Nash weight the less pair there was to test
well, I'll do it, still.. but it wil be long... |
Correct, the higher the Nash weight, the more candidates to test.
See [url=http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=211077&postcount=19]here[/url] for more details. |
1 Attachment(s)
here is 307-1M-1.1M result, no prime
[ATTACH]5222[/ATTACH] |
Status report
k=337 tested till n=2.5M - I'm still working on it.
|
k=349 and 353 are at n=1.2M.
|
I've updated the k=300-2000 page on rieselprime.de with the data from here.
I also included a new page for the [url=http://www.rieselprime.de/NPLB/Drives/NPLB_MiniDrive4.htm]Mini Drive #4[/url] (315, 321, 327, 333, 339, 345) and updated the Individual-page. |
k=311 done [1600k-2000k]
k=303 done [1000k-1500k] k=303 ~75% done [1500k-2000k] No primes, results are sent via email. I would like to reserve k=301 and k=305. |
[quote=unconnected;219929]I would like to reserve k=301 and k=305.[/quote]
I have now Emailed you the files for k=301 and 305. Good luck! :smile: |
Thank you. Hope I'll find prime sooner or later.
|
Status report
k=337 tested till n=2.56M.
|
k=349 and 353 are at n=1.3M.
|
@Gary, Max:
I've checked the results for the MiniDrive #4 (6 k's from 1M to 2M). I've noticed, that the pair 315*2^1000000-1 was done twice! This pair was tested with the MiniDrive #1 (same 6 k's from 600k-1M). The resultfile "results_20090909_0001_GB_nplb_8000.txt" contains this pair. In MiniDrive #4 it was tested again, because the n-range was/is xxx000-xxx000 instead of xxx001-xxx000. So resultfile "results_20100519_0001_GB_nplb_3500.txt" contains this pair, too. Please be sure to upload the range from 001-000 into the server. Have a look at the sievefile you sent me for k=377: it contains the n-values for n=1000000 [b]and[/b] n=2000000! PS: There're 3 k-values with n=1000000 in that sievefile: k=315, 377 and 383. |
[quote=kar_bon;220649]@Gary, Max:
I've checked the results for the MiniDrive #4 (6 k's from 1M to 2M). I've noticed, that the pair 315*2^1000000-1 was done twice! This pair was tested with the MiniDrive #1 (same 6 k's from 600k-1M). The resultfile "results_20090909_0001_GB_nplb_8000.txt" contains this pair. In MiniDrive #4 it was tested again, because the n-range was/is xxx000-xxx000 instead of xxx001-xxx000. So resultfile "results_20100519_0001_GB_nplb_3500.txt" contains this pair, too. Please be sure to upload the range from 001-000 into the server. Have a look at the sievefile you sent me for k=377: it contains the n-values for n=1000000 [B]and[/B] n=2000000! PS: There're 3 k-values with n=1000000 in that sievefile: k=315, 377 and 383.[/quote] Karsten, Is this really a big deal? I do the 1n overlap on all files that I sieve. Gary |
[QUOTE=gd_barnes;220659]Karsten,
Is this really a big deal? I do the 1n overlap on all files that I sieve. Gary[/QUOTE] Because it was your demand to all who reserve manual ranges to do the xxx001 to xxx000 range to be sure testing without losing any pair! Anyway, no problem for me. |
[quote=kar_bon;220665]Because it was your demand to all who reserve manual ranges to do the xxx001 to xxx000 range to be sure testing without losing any pair!
Anyway, no problem for me.[/quote] ?? There are 3 reasons why this does not apply here: 1. Because the 2 individual-k drives are separate drives and sieving efforts. The first individual-k drive ended at n=1M and the new one restarted from n=1M. This will not come up for n>1M. 2. The admins send people ranges with this drive and know to use xxx001 to xxx000 when sending files to people for ranges n>1M. 3. We never said anything about it in the 1st post here because of the above 2 reasons. It's only stated on drives where people are pulling subranges out of larger posted files both here and at CRUS. We only post small beginning files here. You may remember that you made a similar statement about n=600000 for all of the various k=300 to 1001 drives. The main reason that I asked you if it's a problem for you now is that it will happen again at n=1M for other various drives. If it was creating a problem, I/we could remove all tests for n=1M in the future when we are sieving k=400-1001 for n=1M-2M but the files are so large and difficult to manipulate that's it's my preference to either (1) leave them in there (2) be very specific by sieving n=1000001 to 2000000. I guess it is just easier to sieve with -n 1e6 -N 2e6 rather than -n 1000001 -N 2e6. As for how to handle them in the database when they are loaded: Make them a doublecheck. Gary |
And a big reason on my side:
I'm checking [b]all[/b] resultfile from LLRnet/PRPnet for all drives and it's highly automated to save me time instead of checking things by hand. One script takes the big sievefile and extracts the recommended candidates for a 1k or 10k range beginning with xxx001. Doing the same only at the beginning of a new sieverange like 1M-2M will pop up errors like pair is not in that automaticly created sieverange, so i have to check why by hand. That's what I want to avoid. |
OK. I'll make a mental note to sieve only xxxx001 to xxxx000 on various drives in the future -IF- NPLB originally sieved the range immediately below it. Afaik, that should be the case on all drives at this point.
|
395, 397 and 399 at n=1.2M, continuing
|
Status report
k=337 tested till n=2.62M
|
There's about 3 days work left at port 3500 for me!
|
[quote=kar_bon;224515]There's about 3 days work left at port 3500 for me![/quote]
We went through that quicker than expected. n=1.1M-1.2M will be loaded within the next few hours. To make it official: Reserving n=1.1M-1.2M for port 3500. |
[QUOTE=gd_barnes;224657]We went through that quicker than expected. n=1.1M-1.2M will be loaded within the next few hours.
[/QUOTE] In about 3 hours I'm sending back 356 tested pairs, so I can't reserve this amount again! Currently 571 pairs untested minus the 356 -> Server is out of work! |
[quote=kar_bon;224786]In about 3 hours I'm sending back 356 tested pairs, so I can't reserve this amount again!
Currently 571 pairs untested minus the 356 -> Server is out of work![/quote] Done. Sorry about the delay. |
[QUOTE=gd_barnes;224814]Done. Sorry about the delay.[/QUOTE]
Just want to submit and receive more! |
Reserving k's 389, 391 and 393 to n=1.3M
395, 397 and 399 will be finished in a few days to n=1.3M |
Status report
k=337 tested till n=2.67M
|
k=395, 397, 399
k=395, 397, 399 tested n=1M-1.3M
Nothing found - Results emailed |
k=349 and 353 are at n=1.4M. No further primes to report.
This n=100K section took longer than expected because while I was away, the program I use to run/manage my clients on my computer (PSP Runner by DigiK-oz) stopped working for no apparent reason. |
k=389
k=389 tested n=1M-1.3M
Nothing found - Results emailed |
Status report
k=337 tested till n=2.73M
|
k=357
I took NPLB357-1000-1020.txt and NPLB375-1000-1020.txt for a test of speed.
|
1 Attachment(s)
k=357 results, n=1M-1.02M. No further reservation.
(six tests were repeated with LLR, to get a feeling of speed. Same. Both nice programs.) |
1 Attachment(s)
k=375 results, n=1M-1.02M. No further reservation. 0 primes.
|
k=349 and 353 are done to n=1.5M. All three primes previously reported. Results in NPLB database already (it uploaded every day, the last one is uploaded and should be imported at the end of the hour or day). I can email a zip of all the results if you want (I saved them all, in both the original PRPnet and the converted LLRnet formats).
|
[QUOTE=Mini-Geek;233948]k=349 and 353 are done to n=1.5M. All three primes previously reported. Results in NPLB database already (it uploaded every day, the last one is uploaded and should be imported at the end of the hour or day). I can email a zip of all the results if you want (I saved them all, in both the original PRPnet and the converted LLRnet formats).[/QUOTE]
The results in the database should be fine (to clarify: yes, they're imported at the end of the day; only the NPLB public servers are done hourly). I have a handy dandy web page that I can use to pull automatically-sorted results for any range of k and n out of the database, so once you're done with these k's I can process the results very easily. |
[QUOTE=mdettweiler;233993]The results in the database should be fine (to clarify: yes, they're imported at the end of the day; only the NPLB public servers are done hourly). I have a handy dandy web page that I can use to pull automatically-sorted results for any range of k and n out of the database, so once you're done with these k's I can process the results very easily.[/QUOTE]
Oops, never mind, I see now that 1.5M [i]was[/i] the end of your reservation. :smile: In that case, I'll get the results processed as soon as I get the chance and email them to both you and Gary. |
the computer on which i ran 363 crashed. i lost all the data. and no backup. sorry, so i'm releasing it
|
Status report
k=337 tested till n=2.79M
|
Reserving k=309, 313, 317, 319.
|
[QUOTE=gamer007;238850]Reserving k=309, 313, 317, 319.[/QUOTE]
Gamer, what n-range of these would you like to reserve? n=1M-2M is available. |
[QUOTE=gd_barnes;238851]Gamer, what n-range of these would you like to reserve? n=1M-2M is available.[/QUOTE]
I'll start with n=1M-1.02M since I already downloaded the ones posted. |
k=391
k=391 tested n=1M-1.3M
1 prime previously reported - Results emailed |
Status report
k=337 tested till n=2.85M
|
taking k=323 n=1m - 1.02m
|
Gamer is reserving k=309, 313, 317, 319 to n=1.1M.
Max, have you sent him the files yet? |
[QUOTE=gd_barnes;240492]Gamer is reserving k=309, 313, 317, 319 to n=1.1M.
Max, have you sent him the files yet?[/QUOTE] Oh, whoops...I assumed you'd be handling that. I can send him files from the latest RSP2M file (p=1405T) but it will take a day or so since I've only preprocessed (namely: used srfile to convert it to NewPGen format, the most time-consuming step which takes a good 3-4 hours) the RSP1M file that we've been using for the team drives. I'll have to do that for the RSP2M file before I can extract his k's. |
[QUOTE=mdettweiler;240543]Oh, whoops...I assumed you'd be handling that. I can send him files from the latest RSP2M file (p=1405T) but it will take a day or so since I've only preprocessed (namely: used srfile to convert it to NewPGen format, the most time-consuming step which takes a good 3-4 hours) the RSP1M file that we've been using for the team drives. I'll have to do that for the RSP2M file before I can extract his k's.[/QUOTE]
Which option you use with srfile? '-G' will create one big file in newpgen-format and sure this will take much more time. Better use '-g' which will create for every k-value it's own file. Than copy all files needed in one, delete all header lines (only first remain) and call srfile with '-G' for this file and you got it. |
[QUOTE=kar_bon;240546]Which option you use with srfile?
'-G' will create one big file in newpgen-format and sure this will take much more time. Better use '-g' which will create for every k-value it's own file. Than copy all files needed in one, delete all header lines (only first remain) and call srfile with '-G' for this file and you got it.[/QUOTE] That's what I just discovered. The preprocessing finished just a few minutes ago on -g format (which worked perfectly, since for this drive we need separate files for each k). I've emailed the files to you, Gary, and Ian, and will send gamer007 his files shortly. I'll have to try the trick you suggest next time I need to preprocess the 1M file...I didn't know srfile can go from -g to -G faster than it can go from -a to -G. |
[QUOTE=mdettweiler;240548]I'll have to try the trick you suggest next time I need to preprocess the 1M file...I didn't know srfile can go from -g to -G faster than it can go from -a to -G.[/QUOTE]
The abcd-format is already sorted by k-values, but differently stored, so srfile only have to find the header of the k-value and can create the newpgen-format easily. The whole 160M or more candidates with -G take time to sort and write. |
[QUOTE=kar_bon;240551]The abcd-format is already sorted by k-values, but differently stored, so srfile only have to find the header of the k-value and can create the newpgen-format easily.
The whole 160M or more candidates with -G take time to sort and write.[/QUOTE] Yeah, I guessed something like that. I guess what I'm wondering is, is it faster to go from -g to -G, or from -a to -G? Or no difference? (The file needs to be in -G format, i.e. sorted by n primary and k secondary, for the team drives.) |
Thanks guys.
|
[QUOTE=mdettweiler;240543]Oh, whoops...I assumed you'd be handling that. I can send him files from the latest RSP2M file (p=1405T) but it will take a day or so since I've only preprocessed (namely: used srfile to convert it to NewPGen format, the most time-consuming step which takes a good 3-4 hours) the RSP1M file that we've been using for the team drives. I'll have to do that for the RSP2M file before I can extract his k's.[/QUOTE]
Oh, didn't I send you a PM asking you to do it since I was out of town? I'm just checking to make sure you received the PM. |
[QUOTE=gd_barnes;240881]Oh, didn't I send you a PM asking you to do it since I was out of town? I'm just checking to make sure you received the PM.[/QUOTE]
No, I didn't get any PM about that. The last one I have from you is dated "04 Dec 10 07:04 PM" (EST). (BTW: in the future, you may want to use the "read receipt" feature of PMs. That will put a link on your main PM inbox page which, when clicked, shows you if and when all read-receipted PMs you've sent have been read. I use it all the time...that way I know if someone actually just hasn't checked their PM box yet or if they're ignoring my message. :wink:) |
I erroneously sent it to Gamer instead. Gad, the forwarding and responding to of PMs when there is more than one person involved is a pain here.
|
MrOzzy has reserved k=323 for n=1M-1.4M.
|
status update for k=323
Testing at n=1.05m, no primes Note: FFTlen increase from 65536 to 81920 between n=1.051m and 1.052m. Testing now takes 35% longer. |
1 Attachment(s)
k=323 finished untill n=1,1m,no primes, results attached.
next report at 1.2m. |
k=337 tested till n=2.94M
|
Now that the rally is done, back to this.
k=309 tested until n=1.05M k=313 tested until n=1.06M k=317 tested until n=1.06M k=319 tested until n=1.05M |
Taking k=325 to 1.1M:coffee:
please send candidates split into 8 parts to ilikelinustorvalds AT gmail DOT com should take me 5-6 months if thats okay thanks |
[QUOTE=nuggetprime;246338]Taking k=325 to 1.1M:coffee:
please send candidates split into 8 parts to ilikelinustorvalds AT gmail DOT com should take me 5-6 months if thats okay thanks[/QUOTE] No problem--5-6 months for a reservation is a somewhat typical timeframe on this drive. :smile: Regarding splitting the candidates into 8 parts: I can do that, but note that because the tests get bigger as n increases, they would not all finish at the same time. If you'd prefer a more even work distribution, I'd be happy to host a private PRPnet or LLRnet server on this range for you (as I've done for a few others in similar situations). |
Yes,please set up a PRPnet server for that!
But I doesn't need it to be private,everybody should be allowed to put his/her cores on it. As long as it doesn't run dry,I'm fine:smile: |
NewPGen can split files. I used it recently to split a file for 4x2.66GHz and 4x1.5GHz so that everything finishes together. In theory anyway!
|
[QUOTE=nuggetprime;246379]Yes,please set up a PRPnet server for that!
But I doesn't need it to be private,everybody should be allowed to put his/her cores on it. As long as it doesn't run dry,I'm fine:smile:[/QUOTE] Okay, will do. I'll be in touch with you regarding the server port once I get it set up. As for it being "private", by that I mean that it would be crunching your personal reservation. Anyone aware of the port # is of course able to contribute to it, but their contributions would effectively go uncredited. Such ranges are classified as "manual" work as far as the stats are concerned, so it would all go in under your name. As an example of how this has been done in the past, on the (now concluded) k=3010-3200 mini-drive, Gary had for a while a private PRPnet server that he used to distribute work among a couple of his machines. Karsten and I also ran some clients on it for a while, and in Karsten's case even found a few primes. In the end, though, the entire range was imported into the database under Gary's name. Meanwhile, though, we do have a proper public server for this individual-k drive if anyone else is interested in doing normal, credited contributions--that's LLRnet port 7000. So far there has not been enough demand for an additional PRPnet server on this drive, though if interest is expressed we could of course set one up. |
Machine configured to use new private LLRnet server,it's completing pending tasks on port 9000 now.
BTW,why have you added me to team ROLP:razz:? |
[QUOTE=nuggetprime;246510]Machine configured to use new private LLRnet server,it's completing pending tasks on port 9000 now.
BTW,why have you added me to team ROLP:razz:?[/QUOTE] Not to worry, the one ROLP result was from me when I tested the server. Yours will go under whatever team you have configured (presumably Free-DC), or if you're using a pre-4.1.x client they won't be counted in the team stats at all. (That's how I have two results under my name but one under ROLP--I submitted one with 4.0.6 and one with 4.1.3 after I upgraded my clients.) Note that, of course, since this is a personal server, all the results will in the end be imported into the main database under nuggetprime/Free-DC. @everyone else: In case you're wondering what the heck I'm talking about here, the 4.1.x clients now support a "team" field for use in calculating PRPnet's internal stats. |
thanks!
Just noticed that I'll be able to LLR more than 80 candidates per day ,so it will probably take less than three months to get to 1.1M |
k=393
k=393 tested n=1M-1.3M
2 primes previously reported - Results emailed |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 01:37. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.