Archived sieve reservations and discussions
 

This thread contains the old sieve reservations and the old discussions in the sieve reservation thread.
--------------------------------------------
Original post:
2700G-2850G complete (first range)

[url]http://www.sendspace.com/file/j2pe66[/url]

Gribozavr, could you delete all of the candidates with factors (10G-3500G) from the sieve file? After you've done that, please remove all the candidates with k>500000 and upload that file to sendspace*. We'll test all the small k values first before LLRing 500000<k<10M, and LLR manual reservations will be open once the file is up.

Primegrid wants a deeper sieve depth, so we'll give them the bigger k's to test once the optimal sieve depth is close to being reached.

*Put all the candidates with k>500000 into a separate file, but don't upload that file yet.

I have downloaded and verified all submitted factor files.

MooooMoo: Here's a file with small k's:
[url]http://www.sendspace.com/file/vmi4kt[/url]

4700-5500G Complete cipher [Range 1]

[URL]http://www.sendspace.com/file/xt70dp[/URL]

MooMooo: "Combine my Ranges if you get a chance" For example: So you can save space.

3000G-3200G cipher complete
3200G-3500G cipher complete
3500G-3700G cipher complete

TO

3000G-3700G cipher complete

Thanks.

5500-6000G complete [Range1] cipher

[url]http://www.sendspace.com/file/u8cr5l[/url]

Gribozavr: What is the % of factors which are duplicate? Or wut % of actual factors come out from a file.

6000G-6500G Reserved cipher [Range1]

6500G-7000G Range 1 Reserved cipher

6000G-6500G complete [Range 1] Cipher

[url]http://www.sendspace.com/file/phnfcz[/url]

7000G-10000G cipher [Range 1] Reserved

10000G-12000G reserved how high are we going?

I am guessing 50T @ least Josh.

ok, I'm 25% done here on my C2Q Q6600. Is it more efficient to run two singles or one -t2? Has anyone experimented with all the config settings to find something better? Like block size and prime sizes?
12T-15T reserved.

6500G-10000G complete [Range 1] cipher

[url]http://www.sendspace.com/file/pgvgty[/url]

15T-17T cipher Reserved [Range1]

17T-20T Ken_g6 Reserved [Range1]

I'd better get in on this before Cipher takes it all!
Joshua2, from what I've seen, for one N, -t2 is about as fast as two singles. For multiple N's, -t4 looked about as fast as well, but I haven't tested with V0.3.x yet

Which reminds me, MooMoo, my latest version is:

[url]http://home.att.net/%7Ek.brazier/programs/tpsieve-0.3.4-bin.zip[/url]

And I think it's going to stay that way for awhile.