mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Combinatorics & Combinatorial Number Theory (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=112)
-   -   is the factorisation of Mp-1 an advantage ? (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=25836)

bhelmes 2020-08-14 21:44

is the factorisation of Mp-1 an advantage ?
 
A peaceful and pleasant night for you,


if I know the factorisation or a part of the factorisation of Mp-1
do I have any advantages for checking the primality ?


(Mp should be a Mersenne number)


Or in other words, is the factorisation of p-1 helpful ?



I know the theorem of Pocklington for proofing primality
[url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pocklington_primality_test[/url]


Thanks in advance if you spend me some lines :cmd: :truck: :uncwilly:

Bernhard

R. Gerbicz 2020-08-14 22:05

[QUOTE=bhelmes;553693]
if I know the factorisation or a part of the factorisation of Mp-1
do I have any advantages for checking the primality ?
[/QUOTE]

Probably there is no advantage for that, but any odd factor of Mp-1 could give a non-trival factor of another Mersenne number (with prime index),
since r|Mp-1=2*(2^(p-1)-1).

Batalov 2020-08-14 22:13

[QUOTE=bhelmes;553693]Or in other words, is the factorisation of Mp-1 helpful ?[/QUOTE]
N=Mp are a beautiful example of being proven with >>33.33% N[B]+1[/B] factorization (indeed, 100%).
Factorization of N-1 is needless, when you have a 100% N[B]+1[/B] factorization.

JeppeSN 2020-08-16 10:34

Agree with Batalov; for proving primality of M_p, since the full factorization of M_p + 1 is trivial, we do not gain anything from the factorization of M_p - 1.

Of course, it may be fun to find the factorization anyway; [URL="http://factordb.com/index.php?query=2%5En-3&use=n&n=2&VP=on&EV=on&OD=on&PR=on&FF=on&PRP=on&CF=on&U=on&C=on&perpage=200&format=1&sent=Show"]here is a factordb query for tiny examples[/URL].

/JeppeSN

axn 2020-08-16 11:51

[QUOTE=JeppeSN;553877]Of course, it may be fun to find the factorization anyway; [URL="http://factordb.com/index.php?query=2%5En-3&use=n&n=2&VP=on&EV=on&OD=on&PR=on&FF=on&PRP=on&CF=on&U=on&C=on&perpage=200&format=1&sent=Show"]here is a factordb query for tiny examples[/URL].[/QUOTE]

You linked to Mp-2.

JeppeSN 2020-08-17 20:49

[QUOTE=axn;553881]You linked to Mp-2.[/QUOTE]

Oops, that is right. It should have been [URL="http://factordb.com/index.php?query=2%5En-2&use=n&n=2&VP=on&EV=on&OD=on&PR=on&FF=on&PRP=on&CF=on&U=on&C=on&perpage=200&format=1&sent=Show"]2^n-2 for n prime[/URL], or 2*(2^(n-1) - 1). /JeppeSN

bhelmes 2021-02-23 14:32

A peaceful and pleasant day in spite of Covid-19

[QUOTE=JeppeSN;554050][URL="http://factordb.com/index.php?query=2%5En-2&use=n&n=2&VP=on&EV=on&OD=on&PR=on&FF=on&PRP=on&CF=on&U=on&C=on&perpage=200&format=1&sent=Show"]2^n-2 for n prime[/URL][/QUOTE]

I noticed that the factors of Mp-1 have the following proporty:
r odd and r | p-1 then the factors f of Mp-1 with f > p are f=1 mod r

I was a little bit astonished about it. I have no explication for it.

Perhaps someone could explain it to me and other members, interested in number theory. :hello: :cmd: :uncwilly:

@Batalov: The factoring for Mp+1 is easy, sufficient for a proof and very nice, but perhaps the factoring of Mp-1 gives some more details.

Nick 2021-02-23 16:58

See the exercise [URL="https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=477146&postcount=3"]here[/URL]

Viliam Furik 2021-02-23 23:35

[QUOTE=bhelmes;572322]I noticed that the factors of Mp-1 have the following proporty:
r odd and r | p-1 then the factors f of Mp-1 with f > p are f=1 mod r[/QUOTE]

Not quite. M1277-1 has a factor of 2089, among others. 1277-1 is divisible by 11. 2089 is 10 (mod 11), not 1.

LaurV 2021-02-24 02:31

\(n=M_{1277}-1 = 2^{1277}-1-1 = 2^{1277}-2 = 2*(2^{1276}-1)\). That's a string of 1276 of 1, followed by a zero. 1276 is divisible by 2, 4, 11, 29. Therefore (by grouping the ones), n should be divisible by all factors of respective mersenne, i.e. 2 (from the last 0), 3 (from M2), 5 (from M4), 23, 89 (from M11), 233, 1103, 2089 (from M29). You can find plenty of combinations which are not true, actually, almost all where you "cross" them. In fact, you can say that the residue is 1 only when you don't cross them (i.e. 23 and 89 are 1 (mod 11), or 233, 1103 and 2089 are 1 (mod 29)), but that is a known property of mersenne factors :smile:


All times are UTC. The time now is 17:49.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.