- **Number Theory Discussion Group**
(*https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=132*)

- - **Random thoughts on RH**
(*https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=24315*)

Random thoughts on RH1) We can say that proving RH is equivalent to proving that
zeta(s + it) is a non trivial non-zero when the real part (s) is other than 1/2, irrespective of the imaginary part(t) (to be continued). |

[QUOTE=devarajkandadai;514109]1) We can say that proving RH is equivalent to proving that
zeta(s + it) is a non trivial non-zero when the real part (s) is other than 1/2, irrespective of the imaginary part(t) (to be continued).[/QUOTE] 2) one implies many: I.e. if a zero exists on any line parallel to 1/2 then many ought to exist. If this can be proved we have practicality proved RH. |

All times are UTC. The time now is 01:17. |

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11

Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.