Here is an update. I rolled back to v30.3b6 and the TF test is running properly in Windows 11.

[QUOTE=Dobri;593058]Here is an update. I rolled back to v30.3b6 and the TF test is running properly in Windows 11.[/QUOTE]Maybe you could post the assignment line (with the assignment ID masked or replaced with [c]N/A[/c]) so that George (or whomever) can easily test the same thing you're running.

[QUOTE=James Heinrich;593060]Maybe you could post the assignment line (with the assignment ID masked or replaced with [c]N/A[/c]) so that George (or whomever) can easily test the same thing you're running.[/QUOTE]
Factor=[c]N/A[/c],229279313,73,74
Factor=[c]N/A[/c],337654321,75,76
I tried with two different exponents to make sure that the exponent value is not an issue.
The test can run with v30.3b6 in Windows 11 but not with v30.7b4 and v30.7b8. The CPU is Intel Core i7-1065G7.
Note that the tests run properly with v30.7b4 and v30.7b8 in Windows 10 on another computer.

[QUOTE=James Heinrich;593060]Maybe you could post the assignment line (with the assignment ID masked or replaced with [c]N/A[/c]) so that George (or whomever) can easily test the same thing you're running.[/QUOTE]

Dobri's TF problem is already fixed. I'll upload a new build in a few days.

Build 9 available.

[QUOTE=Prime95;593122]Build 9 available.[/QUOTE]
The TF problem is fixed indeed. Thank you, George.

[QUOTE=Prime95;592975]A little bit.[/QUOTE]

[CODE][Work thread Nov 15 21:40] P-1 on M22487611 with B1=2000000, B2=TBD
[Work thread Nov 15 21:40] Using FMA3 FFT length 1152K, Pass1=384, Pass2=3K, clm=2, 8 threads
[Work thread Nov 15 22:10] M22487611 stage 1 complete. 5771296 transforms. Total time: 1799.401 sec.
[Work thread Nov 15 22:10] With trial factoring done to 2^75, optimal B2 is 61*B1 = 122000000.
[Work thread Nov 15 22:10] Using 12286MB of memory.
[Work thread Nov 15 23:11] M22487611 stage 2 complete. 7127841 transforms. Total time: 3696.155 sec.[/CODE]
Intel i7 10700 (non-K) @ 105 W set, 2x8GB 3,200 MT memory.

[QUOTE=Prime95;593122]Build 9 available.[/QUOTE]

Using it with my newest test which started today.

Early indications are about 15% faster with P-1
 

:w00t:

The user override in undoc.txt for the work file size limit (MaxExponents) doesn't seem to work for me. I'm running 30.7b8, although I never tried the functionality with an earlier build or version.

I picked up four DC wavefront PRP-DCs from the strategic DC thread and added them to my work file (with [c]N/A[/c] AIDs, since PrimeNet rejected registration attempts). Prime95 deleted the last three when I started it, so I added [c]MaxExponents=100[/c] to prime.txt and put the lines back, but they were still removed when I started Prime95 again.

Minus the PRP-DCs I was trying to add, my Prime95 work file currently has one wavefront LL DC, one PRP-CF on a 107,xxx,xxx exponent, and four FTC wavefront certs, for one worker.

George, what's the biggest value B2 can be in PM1 method?